StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Materialize vs Next.js

Materialize vs Next.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Materialize
Materialize
Stacks698
Followers1.2K
Votes557
GitHub Stars39.1K
Forks4.7K
Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K

Materialize vs Next.js: What are the differences?

  1. Integration with React Components: Next.js is a React framework that simplifies the process of building React applications, while Materialize is a CSS framework that provides pre-designed components. Next.js offers seamless integration with React components, allowing developers to easily incorporate interactive elements into their web applications. On the other hand, Materialize focuses on styling and provides ready-made components that can be customized to fit the design requirements.

  2. Server-side Rendering: Next.js has built-in support for server-side rendering, enabling faster page loading and improved performance. This feature is particularly useful for SEO purposes and enhancing user experience. In contrast, Materialize focuses more on the front-end presentation of web pages and does not offer server-side rendering capabilities out of the box.

  3. Customization Options: Materialize offers a wide range of customization options for its pre-designed components, allowing developers to tailor the appearance of their web applications to suit their needs. In comparison, Next.js focuses on simplifying the development process and may have limited customization options for styling components unless additional CSS frameworks or libraries are integrated.

  4. Community Support and Documentation: Next.js has a strong community of developers and comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers to find resources and solutions to common problems. Materialize also has a supportive community but may have slightly fewer resources and documentation compared to Next.js due to its focus on CSS styling rather than full-stack web development.

  5. Backend Functionality: Next.js can easily handle backend functionality with its built-in API routes, enabling developers to create serverless functions and interact with databases. Materialize, being primarily a front-end CSS framework, does not offer backend functionality and is more suitable for enhancing the visual appearance of web applications rather than handling complex server-side processes.

  6. Build and Deployment Process: Next.js provides a streamlined build and deployment process, offering features like automatic code splitting and optimized bundle sizes for improved performance. Materialize, being a CSS framework, does not affect the build and deployment process significantly and can be used alongside Next.js for styling purposes without impacting the performance of the application.

In Summary, Next.js and Materialize differ in their focus on integration with React components, server-side rendering capabilities, customization options, community support and documentation, backend functionality, and build and deployment processes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Materialize, Next.js

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Materialize
Materialize
Next.js
Next.js

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
39.1K
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Forks
4.7K
GitHub Forks
29.7K
Stacks
698
Stacks
8.0K
Followers
1.2K
Followers
5.1K
Votes
557
Votes
330
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 102
    Google material design
  • 74
    Easy to use
  • 74
    Responsive
  • 54
    Modern looks
  • 48
    Open source
Cons
  • 7
    Mobile errors
  • 6
    Poor Grid System
  • 2
    Unmaintained
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React

What are some alternatives to Materialize, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase