StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Material UI vs Rails

Material UI vs Rails

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rails
Rails
Stacks20.2K
Followers13.8K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars57.8K
Forks22.0K
Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445

Material UI vs Rails: What are the differences?

Introduction

Material UI and Rails are two popular frameworks used for web development. While Material UI is a front-end framework that focuses on providing a modern and visually appealing user interface, Rails is a back-end framework that emphasizes convention over configuration and follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern. Here are the key differences between Material UI and Rails:

  1. Language: Material UI is primarily based on JavaScript and React, whereas Rails is based on Ruby. Material UI provides a wide range of pre-built UI components and styling options that can be easily customized using JavaScript. Rails, on the other hand, allows developers to write server-side code in Ruby and follows the convention of separating routes, controllers, and views.

  2. Purpose: Material UI is primarily used for creating responsive and visually appealing user interfaces. It provides a set of well-designed components that can be used to build modern web applications. Rails, on the other hand, is a full-stack web development framework that focuses on providing a productive and efficient environment for building web applications. It includes tools and conventions for handling database interactions, routing, and rendering views.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: Material UI has a large and active community of developers who contribute to its development and provide support. It has a rich ecosystem of plugins and extensions that can be used to extend its functionality. Rails also has a strong community and a rich ecosystem of gems, which are Ruby libraries, that can be used to add functionality to Rails applications.

  4. Learning Curve: Material UI is relatively easy to learn and get started with, especially for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript and React. It provides comprehensive documentation and examples that make it easy to understand and use. Rails, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve, especially for developers who are new to Ruby and the MVC pattern. It requires an understanding of concepts such as routes, controllers, models, and views.

  5. Development Speed: Material UI allows developers to quickly prototype and build user interfaces using its pre-built components and styling options. It provides a set of responsive grid layouts that make it easy to create responsive designs. Rails, on the other hand, focuses on providing a productive development environment by following conventions and providing tools for scaffolding and code generation. It includes features such as automatic form handling and database migrations, which can speed up the development process.

  6. Flexibility and Customization: Material UI provides a wide range of pre-built components and styling options, which makes it easy to create visually appealing interfaces. However, it may be less flexible when it comes to customization, as the styling options are limited to what is provided by the framework. Rails, on the other hand, allows developers to have more control over the application's behavior and appearance. It provides flexibility for customizing routes, views, and controllers to meet specific requirements.

In summary, Material UI is a JavaScript and React-based front-end framework that focuses on providing visually appealing user interfaces, while Rails is a Ruby-based back-end framework that provides a productive development environment for building web applications. Material UI is easy to learn and provides a wide range of pre-built components, while Rails has a steeper learning curve but offers more flexibility and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Rails, Material-UI

Shivam
Shivam

AVP - Business at VAYUZ Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Mar 25, 2020

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsJavaJavaRailsRails

Hi Community! Trust everyone is keeping safe. I am exploring the idea of building a #Neobank (App) with end-to-end banking capabilities. In the process of exploring this space, I have come across multiple Apps (N26, Revolut, Monese, etc) and explored their stacks in detail. The confusion remains to be the Backend Tech to be used?

What would you go with considering all of the languages such as Node.js Java Rails Python are suggested by some person or the other. As a general trend, I have noticed the usage of Node with React on the front or Node with a combination of Kotlin and Swift. Please suggest what would be the right approach!

915k views915k
Comments
Ben
Ben

May 19, 2020

Decided

As a small team, we wanted to pick the framework which allowed us to move quickly. There's no option better than Rails. Not having to solve the fundamentals means we can more quickly build our feature set. No other framework can beat ActiveRecord in terms of integration & ease-of use. To top it all of, there's a lot of attention paid to security in the framework, making almost everything safe-by-default.

482k views482k
Comments
Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Decided

Since I came from python I had two choices: #django or #flask. It felt like it was a better idea to go for #django considering I was building a blogging platform, this is kind of what #django was made for. On the other hand, #rails seems to be a fantastic framework to get things done. Although I do not regret any of my time spent on developing with #django I want to give @{#rails}|topic:null| a try some day in the future for the sake of curiosity.

438k views438k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rails
Rails
Material-UI
Material-UI

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

-
Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Statistics
GitHub Stars
57.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
22.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
20.2K
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
13.8K
Followers
3.7K
Votes
5.5K
Votes
445
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 860
    Rapid development
  • 653
    Great gems
  • 607
    Great community
  • 486
    Convention over configuration
  • 418
    Mvc
Cons
  • 24
    Too much "magic" (hidden behavior)
  • 14
    Poor raw performance
  • 12
    Asset system is too primitive and outdated
  • 6
    Bloat in models
  • 6
    Heavy use of mixins
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Rails, Material-UI?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase