StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Material UI vs PHP-MVC

Material UI vs PHP-MVC

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Stacks106
Followers222
Votes3
Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445

Material UI vs PHP-MVC: What are the differences?

Introduction

Material UI and PHP-MVC are both popular technologies used in web development. However, they have some key differences that set them apart from each other. In this article, we will explore these differences and compare Material UI with PHP-MVC.

  1. Component-based vs Model-View-Controller architecture: Material UI is a component-based library for building user interfaces, whereas PHP-MVC follows the Model-View-Controller architectural pattern. In Material UI, the UI is organized into reusable components that can be easily combined and customized, while PHP-MVC separates the application logic into three layers - model, view, and controller.

  2. Front-end vs Backend: Material UI focuses primarily on the front-end development, providing pre-built UI components, styles, and themes. On the other hand, PHP-MVC is a backend framework that focuses on organizing the server-side code and handling requests, data manipulation, and database interactions.

  3. Programming Language: Material UI is primarily built using JavaScript and related technologies like React, whereas PHP-MVC is built using PHP. JavaScript is a client-side scripting language, while PHP is a server-side scripting language. This difference in programming languages affects the development approach and the skills required to work with these technologies.

  4. Ease of Learning: Material UI can have a steeper learning curve for beginners, especially if they are not familiar with JavaScript libraries like React. PHP-MVC, on the other hand, is relatively easier to learn for those who are familiar with PHP and the Model-View-Controller architecture.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Material UI has a large and active community of developers and a vast ecosystem of extensions, tools, and resources. It is widely adopted and has good support. PHP-MVC also has a significant community, but its ecosystem may not be as extensive as Material UI.

  6. Purpose and Use Cases: Material UI is commonly used for building modern, interactive, and visually appealing front-end experiences, especially in single-page applications. PHP-MVC, on the other hand, is more suitable for developing server-side applications, managing data, and handling complex business logic.

In summary, Material UI is a component-based front-end library primarily built in JavaScript, while PHP-MVC is a backend framework following the Model-View-Controller architecture built in PHP. They differ in their development approach, programming language, learning curve, community support, and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on PHP-MVC, Material-UI

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

767k views767k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Material-UI
Material-UI

This project is - by intention - NOT a full framework, it's a bare-bone structure, written in purely native PHP ! The php-mvc skeleton tries to be the extremely slimmed down opposite of big frameworks like Zend2, Symfony or Laravel.

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

-
Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Statistics
Stacks
106
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
222
Followers
3.7K
Votes
3
Votes
445
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to Learn
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
Integrations
PHP
PHP
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to PHP-MVC, Material-UI?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase