Material UI vs Phoenix Framework

Overview

Material-UI

Stacks2.7K

Followers3.7K

Votes445

Phoenix Framework

Stacks1.0K

Followers1.0K

Votes678

GitHub Stars22.6K

Forks3.0K

Material UI vs Phoenix Framework: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Component Library vs Web Framework**: Material UI is a component library for React applications that provides pre-designed, customizable components for building user interfaces. Phoenix Framework, on the other hand, is a web framework that follows the MVC pattern and is used for building full-stack web applications with a focus on real-time features and performance.

2. **Language and Ecosystem**: Material UI is built to work seamlessly with React, a popular JavaScript library for building user interfaces, while Phoenix Framework is built using Elixir, a functional programming language known for its scalability and fault-tolerance in building distributed systems.

3. **Styling Approach**: Material UI provides a set of predefined styles and themes that can be easily customized using CSS-in-JS or traditional CSS, offering a more opinionated styling approach. Phoenix Framework, on the other hand, allows developers more flexibility in choosing styling libraries and approaches based on their preferences.

4. **Routing and Navigation**: Material UI does not directly handle routing and navigation as it is primarily a component library, whereas Phoenix Framework provides a robust routing system out of the box, making it easier to manage different routes and URLs in a web application.

5. **Server-Side Rendering and SSR**: Phoenix Framework provides built-in support for server-side rendering, which can improve initial page load times and search engine optimization, while Material UI focuses on client-side rendering in React applications, which can impact initial page load performance.

6. **Data Management and ORM**: Phoenix Framework comes with an ORM (Ecto) for managing database interactions and relationships, offering a structured approach to handling data in web applications. In contrast, Material UI does not address data management concerns, as its primary focus is on UI components and design.

In Summary, the key differences between Material UI and Phoenix Framework lie in their focus on component libraries vs web frameworks, language and ecosystem choices, styling approaches, routing and navigation capabilities, server-side rendering support, and data management solutions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Material-UI, Phoenix Framework

Xinyi

Software Developer at DCSIL

Oct 9, 2020

Decided

As our team will be building a web application, HTML5 and CSS3 are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.

359k views359k

Comments

Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

767k views767k

Comments

Brian

Unemployed at Zoho

Dec 5, 2020

Review

All three can be integrated with React and have their own React components. Out of these, Bootstrap is the easiest as it is built on an All three can be integrated with React and have their own React components. Out of these, Bootstrap is the easiest as it is built on upon HTML and CSS. MD on the other hand is complex, and requires a lot of work to make it look good with your UI. imo Material is definitely worth learning as it def looks better than BS out of the box. If your trying to learn All three can be integrated with React and have their own React components. Out of these, Bootstrap is the easiest as it is built on an All three can be integrated with React and have their own React components. Out of these, Bootstrap is the easiest as it is built on upon HTML and CSS. MD on the other hand is complex, and requires a lot of work to make it look good with your UI. imo Material is definitely worth learning as it def looks better than BS out of the box. If you're trying to learn design vs functionality, Id say take the time to learn MD. Otherwise choose Bootstrap (and as Material was actually born from Bootstrap, you could make BS elements look pretty close to MD with a little work)

278 views278

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI	Phoenix Framework
Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.	Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.
Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 22.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 3.0K
Stacks 2.7K	Stacks 1.0K
Followers 3.7K	Followers 1.0K
Votes 445	Votes 678
Pros & Cons
Pros 141 React 82 Material Design 60 Ui components 30 CSS framework 26 Component Cons 36 Hard to learn. Bad documentation 29 Hard to customize 22 Hard to understand Docs 9 Bad performance 7 Extra library needed for date/time pickers	Pros 120 High performance 76 Super fast 70 Rapid development 62 Open source 60 Erlang VM Cons 6 No jobs 5 Very difficult
Integrations
React Emotion Next.js styled-components Node.js	Elixir

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, Phoenix Framework?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Material UI vs Phoenix Framework: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Component Library vs Web Framework**: Material UI is a component library for React applications that provides pre-designed, customizable components for building user interfaces. Phoenix Framework, on the other hand, is a web framework that follows the MVC pattern and is used for building full-stack web applications with a focus on real-time features and performance.

2. **Language and Ecosystem**: Material UI is built to work seamlessly with React, a popular JavaScript library for building user interfaces, while Phoenix Framework is built using Elixir, a functional programming language known for its scalability and fault-tolerance in building distributed systems.

3. **Styling Approach**: Material UI provides a set of predefined styles and themes that can be easily customized using CSS-in-JS or traditional CSS, offering a more opinionated styling approach. Phoenix Framework, on the other hand, allows developers more flexibility in choosing styling libraries and approaches based on their preferences.

4. **Routing and Navigation**: Material UI does not directly handle routing and navigation as it is primarily a component library, whereas Phoenix Framework provides a robust routing system out of the box, making it easier to manage different routes and URLs in a web application.

5. **Server-Side Rendering and SSR**: Phoenix Framework provides built-in support for server-side rendering, which can improve initial page load times and search engine optimization, while Material UI focuses on client-side rendering in React applications, which can impact initial page load performance.

6. **Data Management and ORM**: Phoenix Framework comes with an ORM (Ecto) for managing database interactions and relationships, offering a structured approach to handling data in web applications. In contrast, Material UI does not address data management concerns, as its primary focus is on UI components and design.

Material UI vs Phoenix Framework

Overview