Material Design for Angular vs Sass

Overview

Sass

Stacks44.8K

Followers32.2K

Votes3.0K

GitHub Stars15.3K

Forks2.2K

Material Design for Angular

Stacks11.8K

Followers9.6K

Votes522

GitHub Stars16.5K

Forks3.4K

Material Design for Angular vs Sass: What are the differences?

Syntax and Functionality: Material Design for Angular provides ready-to-use components and directives following Google's Material Design guidelines, making it easier for developers to create consistent and visually appealing interfaces. On the other hand, Sass is a tool that extends CSS with features like variables, nesting, and mixins, allowing developers to write more maintainable and organized stylesheets.
Scope of Use: Material Design for Angular is specifically designed for building web applications using Angular framework, focusing on providing a consistent design language and user experience. Whereas Sass can be used with any web development project regardless of the framework or library being used, offering more flexibility in terms of styling options and compatibility.
File Extensions: Material Design for Angular uses the standard file extensions for Angular components and templates, such as .ts for TypeScript files and .html for HTML templates. On the contrary, Sass files have a .scss or .sass extension, showcasing the difference in file formats and usage between the two technologies.
Community Support: Material Design for Angular being a part of the Angular ecosystem benefits from the strong community support and regular updates from Google. Sass, being an independent preprocessor, has its own dedicated community that continuously contributes to its development and improvement.
Integration with Tools: Material Design for Angular seamlessly integrates with Angular CLI and other Angular-specific tools for building, testing, and deploying applications. Sass, being a standalone technology, can be used with various task runners and build tools like Gulp or Webpack to enhance the workflow and optimize the styling process.
Learning Curve: Material Design for Angular requires a basic understanding of Angular concepts and directives to effectively utilize its components and functionalities. On the other hand, Sass can be quickly adopted by developers familiar with CSS, offering a smoother learning curve with its easy-to-understand syntax and features.

In Summary, Material Design for Angular focuses on providing a framework for building web apps with Angular and adhering to Material Design guidelines, while Sass enhances CSS with advanced features and flexibility for styling web projects across different frameworks and libraries.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Sass, Material Design for Angular

Anonymous

CEO at ME!

Jun 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Sass

Stylus

PostCSS

Originally, I was going to start using @{Sass}|tool:1171| with Parcel, but then I learned about @{Stylus}|tool:1172|, which looked interesting because it can get the property values of something directly instead of through variables, and @{PostCSS}|tool:3339|, which looked interesting because you can customize your Pre/Post-processing. Which tool would you recommend?

547k views547k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sass	Material Design for Angular
Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.	Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 15.3K	GitHub Stars 16.5K
GitHub Forks 2.2K	GitHub Forks 3.4K
Stacks 44.8K	Stacks 11.8K
Followers 32.2K	Followers 9.6K
Votes 3.0K	Votes 522
Pros & Cons
Pros 613 Variables 594 Mixins 466 Nested rules 410 Maintainable 300 Functions Cons 6 Needs to be compiled	Pros 122 Ui components 63 Backed by google 51 Free 51 Backed by angular 47 Javascript Cons 4 No practical examples
Integrations
No integrations available	AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Sass, Material Design for Angular?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Stylus

Stylus is a revolutionary new language, providing an efficient, dynamic, and expressive way to generate CSS. Supporting both an indented syntax and regular CSS style.

Related Comparisons

Material Design for Angular vs Sass: What are the differences?

Syntax and Functionality: Material Design for Angular provides ready-to-use components and directives following Google's Material Design guidelines, making it easier for developers to create consistent and visually appealing interfaces. On the other hand, Sass is a tool that extends CSS with features like variables, nesting, and mixins, allowing developers to write more maintainable and organized stylesheets.
Scope of Use: Material Design for Angular is specifically designed for building web applications using Angular framework, focusing on providing a consistent design language and user experience. Whereas Sass can be used with any web development project regardless of the framework or library being used, offering more flexibility in terms of styling options and compatibility.
File Extensions: Material Design for Angular uses the standard file extensions for Angular components and templates, such as .ts for TypeScript files and .html for HTML templates. On the contrary, Sass files have a .scss or .sass extension, showcasing the difference in file formats and usage between the two technologies.
Community Support: Material Design for Angular being a part of the Angular ecosystem benefits from the strong community support and regular updates from Google. Sass, being an independent preprocessor, has its own dedicated community that continuously contributes to its development and improvement.
Integration with Tools: Material Design for Angular seamlessly integrates with Angular CLI and other Angular-specific tools for building, testing, and deploying applications. Sass, being a standalone technology, can be used with various task runners and build tools like Gulp or Webpack to enhance the workflow and optimize the styling process.
Learning Curve: Material Design for Angular requires a basic understanding of Angular concepts and directives to effectively utilize its components and functionalities. On the other hand, Sass can be quickly adopted by developers familiar with CSS, offering a smoother learning curve with its easy-to-understand syntax and features.

Material Design for Angular vs Sass

Overview