Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Material Design for Angular vs Rust: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Material Design for Angular and Rust.
Architecture: The key difference between Material Design for Angular and Rust lies in their architecture. Material Design for Angular is a UI component framework that is built on top of Angular, whereas Rust is a programming language that focuses on performance, reliability, and concurrency. While Material Design for Angular provides pre-built UI components and styles, Rust offers low-level control and memory safety.
Purpose: Another difference is the purpose of these two technologies. Material Design for Angular is mainly used for building modern and visually appealing user interfaces (UI) for web applications. On the other hand, Rust is designed for system programming and can be used to build a wide range of applications, including web servers, embedded systems, and even operating systems.
Language Paradigm: Material Design for Angular is a combination of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, with a heavy reliance on the Angular framework. It follows a declarative programming paradigm, where developers describe what they want the UI to look like, and Angular takes care of the implementation details. In contrast, Rust is a statically-typed systems programming language that follows an imperative programming paradigm. It provides low-level control over memory management and allows developers to write efficient and safe code.
Community Support: Material Design for Angular has a large and active community of developers, which means that there is a wealth of resources, tutorials, and third-party libraries available for developers to use. Rust, while also having a growing community, is relatively newer compared to Angular. However, it has gained popularity due to its unique features and strong focus on performance and safety.
Learning Curve: The learning curve differs between Material Design for Angular and Rust. Material Design for Angular is built on top of the Angular framework, so developers who are already familiar with Angular will find it relatively easier to learn and use. On the other hand, Rust has a more steep learning curve, especially for developers who are new to systems programming or low-level languages. Its safety-focused features and borrow checker can be challenging to understand at first.
Use Cases: Lastly, the use cases for Material Design for Angular and Rust differ. Material Design for Angular is well-suited for building web applications, especially those that require a modern and responsive UI. It provides a rich set of UI components and styles that can be customized to match the application's branding. On the other hand, Rust is commonly used for developing high-performance and reliable systems software, such as operating systems, network services, and embedded systems, where low-level control over resources and safety are crucial.
In summary, Material Design for Angular focuses on providing ready-to-use UI components and styles for web applications, while Rust is a systems programming language that offers low-level control, performance, and memory safety for a wide range of applications.
So, I've been working with all 3 languages JavaScript, Python and Rust, I know that all of these languages are important in their own domain but, I haven't took any of it to the point where i could say I'm a pro at any of these languages. I learned JS and Python out of my own excitement, I learned rust for some IoT based projects. just confused which one i should invest my time in first... that does have Job and freelance potential in market as well...
I am an undergraduate in computer science. (3rd Year)
I would start focusing on Javascript because even working with Rust and Python, you're always going to encounter some Javascript for front-ends at least. It has: - more freelancing opportunities (starting to work short after a virus/crisis, that's gonna help) - can also do back-end if needed (I would personally avoid specializing in this since there's better languages for the back-end part) - hard to avoid. it's everywhere and not going away (well not yet)
Then, later, for back-end programming languages, Rust seems like your best bet. Its pros: - it's satisfying to work with (after the learning curve) - it's got potential to grow big in the next year (also with better paying jobs) - it's super versatile (you can do high-perf system stuff, graphics, ffi, as well as your classic api server) It comes with a few cons though: - it's harder to learn (expect to put in years) - the freelancing options are virtually non-existent (and I would expect them to stay limited, as rust is better for long-term software than prototypes)
I suggest you to go with JavaScript. From my perspective JavaScript is the language you should invest your time in. The community of javascript and lots of framework helps developer to build what they want to build in no time whether it a desktop, web, mobile based application or even you can use javascript as a backend as well. There are lot of frameworks you can start learning i suggest you to go with (react,vue) library both are easy to learn than angular which is a complete framework.
And if you want to go with python as a secondary tool then i suggest you to learn a python framework (Flask,Django).
I chose Golang as a language to write Tango because it's super easy to get started with. I also considered Rust, but learning curve of it is much higher than in Golang. I felt like I would need to spend an endless amount of time to even get the hello world app working in Rust. While easy to learn, Golang still shows good performance, multithreading out of the box and fun to implement.
I also could choose PHP and create a phar-based tool, but I was not sure that it would be a good choice as I want to scale to be able to process Gbs of access log data
Pros of Material Design for Angular
- Ui components122
- Backed by google63
- Free51
- Backed by angular51
- Javascript47
- Open source34
- Responsiveness33
- Easy to learn30
- Quick to develop28
- Customizable20
- Powerful8
- Easy to start8
- Flexible6
- Themes5
- Flexbox Layouts4
- Great community3
- I like its design3
- Great extensions2
- Consistents1
- CDK1
- It's the best looking out of the box1
- Seamless integration with AngularJS but lack of docs1
- Progressive Web Apps - to learn0
Pros of Rust
- Guaranteed memory safety144
- Fast131
- Open source87
- Minimal runtime75
- Pattern matching70
- Type inference63
- Concurrent56
- Algebraic data types56
- Efficient C bindings46
- Practical43
- Best advances in languages in 20 years37
- Safe, fast, easy + friendly community32
- Fix for C/C++30
- Stablity25
- Zero-cost abstractions24
- Closures23
- Extensive compiler checks20
- Great community20
- Async/await18
- No NULL type18
- Completely cross platform: Windows, Linux, Android15
- No Garbage Collection15
- Great documentations14
- High-performance14
- Generics12
- Super fast12
- High performance12
- Macros11
- Fearless concurrency11
- Guaranteed thread data race safety11
- Safety no runtime crashes11
- Helpful compiler10
- Compiler can generate Webassembly10
- Prevents data races9
- Easy Deployment9
- RLS provides great IDE support9
- Painless dependency management8
- Real multithreading8
- Good package management7
- Support on Other Languages5
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Material Design for Angular
- No practical examples4
Cons of Rust
- Hard to learn27
- Ownership learning curve24
- Unfriendly, verbose syntax12
- High size of builded executable4
- Many type operations make it difficult to follow4
- No jobs4
- Variable shadowing4
- Use it only for timeoass not in production1