StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material Design for Angular vs Pingendo

Material Design for Angular vs Pingendo

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K
Pingendo
Pingendo
Stacks33
Followers204
Votes4

Material Design for Angular vs Pingendo: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Material Design for Angular and Pingendo are popular frameworks used for web development. Here are some key differences between the two:

  1. Component Library Integration: Material Design for Angular offers a wide range of pre-built components following the Material Design guidelines, making it easier for developers to create consistent and visually appealing user interfaces. Pingendo, on the other hand, focuses more on providing a drag-and-drop interface for building websites, with less emphasis on predefined components.

  2. Customization Flexibility: Material Design for Angular allows for greater customization options through its theming and styling capabilities, enabling developers to tailor the components to fit their specific design needs. Pingendo, while offering some customization features, might not provide the same level of flexibility as Material Design for Angular in terms of design modifications.

  3. Documentation and Support: Material Design for Angular is backed by thorough documentation and a large community of developers, offering extensive support and resources for troubleshooting and learning. Pingendo, while having its own set of tutorials and resources, may not have as comprehensive documentation and community as Material Design for Angular.

  4. Project Structure and Organization: Material Design for Angular provides a structured project layout and guidelines for organizing code, facilitating scalability and maintainability in larger projects. Pingendo, being more focused on the visual aspect of web design, might not offer the same level of guidance on project structure and organization.

  5. Performance Optimization: Material Design for Angular comes with built-in optimizations for performance, such as tree-shakable modules and lazy loading, to enhance the speed and efficiency of web applications. Pingendo, while not lacking in performance capabilities, may not have as many built-in optimizations as Material Design for Angular.

  6. Learning Curve: Material Design for Angular can have a steeper learning curve due to its more advanced features and concepts, especially for beginners in web development. Pingendo, with its user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, may be more accessible for those new to web design and development.

In Summary, Material Design for Angular offers a robust component library, customization flexibility, extensive documentation and support, structured project organization, performance optimizations, and a steeper learning curve compared to Pingendo's emphasis on visual design, user-friendly interface, potentially limited customization options, documentation and community support, project structure guidance, performance optimizations, and ease of use for beginners.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Pingendo
Pingendo

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Create quality HTML prototypes quickly, using popular open source tools like Bootstrap, LESS, Fontawesome and more.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
11.8K
Stacks
33
Followers
9.6K
Followers
204
Votes
522
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Free
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
Pros
  • 4
    It is free
Cons
  • 1
    Branded pages
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Bootstrap
Bootstrap

What are some alternatives to Material Design for Angular, Pingendo?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase