StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Marionette vs React

Marionette vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Marionette
Marionette
Stacks169
Followers128
Votes80
GitHub Stars7.1K
Forks1.2K

Marionette vs React: What are the differences?

  1. DOM Manipulation and Rendering: Marionette is primarily focused on providing enhanced structure and organization to Backbone.js applications by adding features like regions, layouts, and views. It provides a higher level of abstraction for managing complex UI structures. On the other hand, React is a JavaScript library that focuses on efficiently updating and rendering components based on changes in data. It achieves this by using a virtual DOM to minimize changes in the actual browser DOM, resulting in faster rendering and better performance.

  2. Component-Based Architecture: React is known for its component-based architecture, where the UI is divided into smaller reusable components. Each component manages its own state, and React efficiently updates and renders only the components that have changed. Marionette, while providing some similar concepts, is more focused on application structure and managing the relationships between views rather than component-based development. Components in Marionette are represented as views and managed through Marionette's view hierarchy.

  3. One-Way Data Flow: React follows a one-way data flow, where data flows from parent components to child components through props. Child components cannot directly modify the data passed to them; instead, they raise events or callbacks to the parent components to update the state. On the other hand, Marionette does not enforce a specific data flow pattern and allows more flexibility in data manipulation and sharing between views.

  4. Virtual DOM vs. Backbone Models: React uses a virtual DOM to efficiently update and render components by comparing the virtual DOM with the actual browser DOM, minimizing manipulation of the actual DOM. On the other hand, Marionette uses Backbone models and collections to represent and manipulate data. While Marionette provides abstractions for handling events and data binding, it does not have a built-in virtual DOM like React.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: React has a large and vibrant community with extensive support, resources, and third-party libraries available. It is widely adopted and used by many companies and developers. Marionette, while also having a supportive community, has a smaller user base compared to React. This can affect the availability of resources, documentation, and community support.

  6. Learning Curve and Complexity: React has a relatively steeper learning curve compared to Marionette, especially for developers who are new to component-based development or virtual DOM concepts. Marionette, being built on Backbone.js, can be easier to grasp for developers already familiar with Backbone or similar frameworks.

In summary, key differences between Marionette and React include their approach to DOM manipulation and rendering, component-based architecture, data flow patterns, the presence of a virtual DOM, community and ecosystem support, and the learning curve and complexity associated with each framework.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Marionette

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Marionette
Marionette

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Layouts; Utilities; Behaviors; Radio; Objects
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
7.1K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
169
Followers
147.0K
Followers
128
Votes
4.1K
Votes
80
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 20
    Uses Backbone
  • 20
    MVC compliant
  • 13
    Views management
  • 9
    View management
  • 7
    JavaScript
Integrations
No integrations available
Meteor
Meteor
JavaScript
JavaScript
Algolia
Algolia
Backbone.js
Backbone.js

What are some alternatives to React, Marionette?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase