StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. LocalStack vs Minio

LocalStack vs Minio

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Minio
Minio
Stacks638
Followers670
Votes43
GitHub Stars57.8K
Forks6.4K
LocalStack
LocalStack
Stacks57
Followers136
Votes33

LocalStack vs Minio: What are the differences?

Introduction

LocalStack and Minio are two popular tools used in the cloud computing industry. While both serve different purposes, they have key differences that set them apart from each other. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

  1. Deployment Approach: LocalStack is a local cloud infrastructure tool that allows developers to deploy and test their applications locally. It provides a fully functional local version of various AWS services. On the other hand, Minio is a self-hosted object storage server that allows users to create their own S3-compatible storage infrastructure. It can be deployed both locally and on the cloud.

  2. Functionality: LocalStack aims to replicate the functionality of various AWS services like S3, DynamoDB, SQS, and more. It provides a local sandbox environment for testing and developing applications that rely on these services. In contrast, Minio primarily focuses on providing object storage capabilities, similar to Amazon S3. It is designed specifically for storing and managing large amounts of unstructured data.

  3. Scalability: LocalStack is limited in terms of scalability since it is meant for local development and testing purposes. It is not suitable for handling large-scale production workloads. On the other hand, Minio is designed to scale horizontally and can handle massive amounts of data. It can be deployed across multiple servers, allowing for high availability and fault tolerance.

  4. Integration with Public Cloud: LocalStack does not integrate directly with any public cloud providers. It creates a local environment that mimics the behavior of AWS services but does not connect to the actual AWS infrastructure. In contrast, Minio can integrate with various public cloud platforms, such as AWS, GCP, and Azure. This allows users to seamlessly migrate their data between different cloud providers.

  5. Configuration Flexibility: LocalStack provides a predefined set of AWS services and their configurations cannot be modified. It aims to replicate the behavior of these services as closely as possible. On the other hand, Minio offers a high degree of configuration flexibility. Users can tweak various parameters to optimize performance, storage backend, and security settings according to their specific requirements.

  6. Pricing Model: LocalStack is an open-source tool and is available for free. Users can access and utilize all its features without any cost. On the other hand, Minio operates on a subscription-based pricing model. It offers both free and paid plans, depending on the user's storage requirements and additional features needed.

In summary, LocalStack is a tool for local development and testing purposes, providing a local environment with replicated AWS services. On the other hand, Minio is a self-hosted object storage server that can be used both locally and on the cloud, focusing primarily on object storage capabilities and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Minio
Minio
LocalStack
LocalStack

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

LocalStack provides an easy-to-use test/mocking framework for developing Cloud applications.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
57.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
638
Stacks
57
Followers
670
Followers
136
Votes
43
Votes
33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Store and Serve Resumes & Job Description PDF, Backups
  • 8
    S3 Compatible
  • 4
    Simple
  • 4
    Open Source
  • 3
    Lambda Compute
Cons
  • 3
    Deletion of huge buckets is not possible
Pros
  • 4
    No dependency on cloud
  • 4
    Integration with Python/nosetests
  • 4
    Local/offline testing
  • 3
    The correct URL is https://github.com/localstack/locals
  • 3
    Cost effective testing
Cons
  • 2
    Doesn't work well on Windows
  • 1
    No proper admin panel/web UI
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Amazon Kinesis Firehose
Amazon Kinesis Firehose
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Amazon SNS
Amazon SNS
Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
Amazon API Gateway
Amazon API Gateway
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Amazon Elasticsearch Service
Amazon Elasticsearch Service

What are some alternatives to Minio, LocalStack?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

AWS Amplify

AWS Amplify

A JavaScript library for frontend and mobile developers building cloud-enabled applications. The library is a declarative interface across different categories of operations in order to make common tasks easier to add into your application. The default implementation works with Amazon Web Services (AWS) resources but is designed to be open and pluggable for usage with other cloud services that wish to provide an implementation or custom backends.

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

awless

awless

awless is a fast, powerful and easy-to-use command line interface (CLI) to manage Amazon Web Services.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot