Local by Flywheel vs XAMPP

Overview

XAMPP

Stacks142

Followers272

Votes6

Local by Flywheel

Stacks43

Followers90

Votes3

Local by Flywheel vs XAMPP: What are the differences?

Local by Flywheel and XAMPP are both popular web development tools that allow developers to create and test websites locally on their machines. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Deployment Process: Local by Flywheel has a more streamlined and user-friendly deployment process compared to XAMPP. With Local, you can easily deploy your local website to a live server with just a few clicks. On the other hand, XAMPP requires manual configuration and setup of the live server, which can be more complex and time-consuming.
Environment Configuration: Local by Flywheel provides an all-in-one packaged solution with pre-configured environments (e.g., PHP, MySQL) specifically optimized for WordPress development. It sets up all the necessary services automatically, saving time and effort. In contrast, XAMPP requires manual configuration of each component (e.g., PHP, Apache, MySQL) which can be overwhelming for beginners or developers looking for a quick setup.
User Interface: Local by Flywheel offers a user-friendly interface with an intuitive dashboard that allows for easy management of local websites, databases, and services. It provides a visually appealing and simplified experience for developers. On the other hand, XAMPP has a more basic and functional interface, which may require some technical knowledge to navigate and manage.
Collaboration and Sharing: Local by Flywheel has built-in collaboration features that allow developers to easily share their local websites with team members or clients. It provides options for generating shareable links or pushing the website to a live server. XAMPP, on the other hand, lacks built-in collaboration features and requires manual deployment of websites for sharing or collaboration.
Operating System Compatibility: Local by Flywheel is compatible with both Windows and macOS operating systems, providing a consistent experience across different platforms. XAMPP, on the other hand, is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it more versatile in terms of operating system compatibility.
Ease of Installation: Local by Flywheel offers a straightforward installation process, where the software is installed as a standalone application. It takes care of all the dependencies and configurations, making it easy for users to get started quickly. In contrast, XAMPP requires manual installation and configuration of each component, which can be more time-consuming and challenging for beginners.

In summary, Local by Flywheel emphasizes simplicity and user-friendliness, providing a seamless experience for setting up WordPress sites with features like one-click staging and easy SSL setup. XAMPP, on the other hand, offers a more traditional approach with a comprehensive stack including Apache, MySQL, PHP, and Perl, making it suitable for a wide range of web development projects beyond WordPress.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

XAMPP	Local by Flywheel
It consists mainly of the Apache HTTP Server, MariaDB database, and interpreters for scripts written in the PHP and Perl programming languages.	It is a free local development environment designed to simplify the workflow of WordPress developers and designers. It makes creating a local WordPress site a light breeze. Any site created with it, will automatically have a self-signed certificate created.
-	ONE-CLICK WORDPRESS INSTALLATION; HASSLE-FREE LOCAL SSL SUPPORT; SSH + WP-CLI ACCESS
Statistics
Stacks 142	Stacks 43
Followers 272	Followers 90
Votes 6	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 6 Easy set up and installation of files	Pros 1 Faster setup 1 Superior user interface 1 Optimized for Wordpress development
Integrations
No integrations available	Windows macOS

What are some alternatives to XAMPP, Local by Flywheel?

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Local by Flywheel vs XAMPP: What are the differences?

Local by Flywheel and XAMPP are both popular web development tools that allow developers to create and test websites locally on their machines. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Deployment Process: Local by Flywheel has a more streamlined and user-friendly deployment process compared to XAMPP. With Local, you can easily deploy your local website to a live server with just a few clicks. On the other hand, XAMPP requires manual configuration and setup of the live server, which can be more complex and time-consuming.
Environment Configuration: Local by Flywheel provides an all-in-one packaged solution with pre-configured environments (e.g., PHP, MySQL) specifically optimized for WordPress development. It sets up all the necessary services automatically, saving time and effort. In contrast, XAMPP requires manual configuration of each component (e.g., PHP, Apache, MySQL) which can be overwhelming for beginners or developers looking for a quick setup.
User Interface: Local by Flywheel offers a user-friendly interface with an intuitive dashboard that allows for easy management of local websites, databases, and services. It provides a visually appealing and simplified experience for developers. On the other hand, XAMPP has a more basic and functional interface, which may require some technical knowledge to navigate and manage.
Collaboration and Sharing: Local by Flywheel has built-in collaboration features that allow developers to easily share their local websites with team members or clients. It provides options for generating shareable links or pushing the website to a live server. XAMPP, on the other hand, lacks built-in collaboration features and requires manual deployment of websites for sharing or collaboration.
Operating System Compatibility: Local by Flywheel is compatible with both Windows and macOS operating systems, providing a consistent experience across different platforms. XAMPP, on the other hand, is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it more versatile in terms of operating system compatibility.
Ease of Installation: Local by Flywheel offers a straightforward installation process, where the software is installed as a standalone application. It takes care of all the dependencies and configurations, making it easy for users to get started quickly. In contrast, XAMPP requires manual installation and configuration of each component, which can be more time-consuming and challenging for beginners.

Local by Flywheel vs XAMPP

Overview