StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. LiteSpeed vs Microsoft IIS

LiteSpeed vs Microsoft IIS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Stacks15.5K
Followers7.7K
Votes236
LiteSpeed
LiteSpeed
Stacks2.2K
Followers134
Votes0

LiteSpeed vs Microsoft IIS: What are the differences?

## LiteSpeed vs Microsoft IIS

LiteSpeed and Microsoft IIS are popular web servers used for hosting websites. Here are the key differences between LiteSpeed and Microsoft IIS:

1. **Performance**:
LiteSpeed is known for its superior performance compared to Microsoft IIS. LiteSpeed utilizes event-driven architecture, which allows it to handle a larger number of concurrent connections efficiently. On the other hand, Microsoft IIS is known to consume more resources and may not perform as well under heavy loads.

2. **Scalability**:
LiteSpeed is considered more scalable than Microsoft IIS. LiteSpeed's scalability is evident in its ability to efficiently handle high traffic volumes without compromising performance. In contrast, Microsoft IIS may require additional hardware resources to scale effectively, making it less cost-effective for high-demand websites.

3. **Compatibility**:
Microsoft IIS has better compatibility with Windows operating systems as it is developed by Microsoft specifically for the Windows platform. In contrast, LiteSpeed is compatible with a wide range of operating systems, including Windows, making it a more versatile option for hosting websites.

4. **Security**:
LiteSpeed is often praised for its robust security features, including built-in anti-DDoS protection and support for secure communication protocols. Microsoft IIS also offers security features, but LiteSpeed is known to prioritize security enhancements and updates more frequently, making it a top choice for security-conscious website owners.

5. **Cost**:
In terms of cost, LiteSpeed may have a higher initial licensing cost compared to Microsoft IIS. However, the overall cost of ownership may be lower with LiteSpeed due to its efficient resource utilization and lower hardware requirements for scalability.

6. **Community Support**:
Microsoft IIS benefits from a larger user community and extensive documentation, making it easier to find solutions to common issues. LiteSpeed, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller community of users, which could result in fewer resources for troubleshooting and support.

In Summary, LiteSpeed and Microsoft IIS differ in performance, scalability, compatibility, security, cost, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Microsoft IIS, LiteSpeed

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
LiteSpeed
LiteSpeed

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

It is a drop-in Apache replacement and the leading high-performance, high-scalability server. You can replace your existing Apache server with it without changing your configuration or operating system details. As a drop-in replacement, it allows you to quickly eliminate Apache bottlenecks in 15 minutes with zero downtime.

-
Event Driven Architecture; Apache Drop-In Replacement; HTTP/2 & QUIC Support; Zero Downtime Maintenance; CloudLinux Integration; Fastest PHP Available; Use with cPanel, Plesk, DirectAdmin, CyberPanel etc; Unlimited Concurrent Connections; Mod_Security Compatible
Statistics
Stacks
15.5K
Stacks
2.2K
Followers
7.7K
Followers
134
Votes
236
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 83
    Great with .net
  • 55
    I'm forced to use iis
  • 27
    Use nginx
  • 18
    Azure integration
  • 15
    Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
Cons
  • 1
    Hard to set up
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
PHP
PHP
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
cPanel
cPanel
Python
Python
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Mac OS X
Mac OS X

What are some alternatives to Microsoft IIS, LiteSpeed?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase