XAMPP vs lighttpd

Overview

lighttpd

Stacks156

Followers133

Votes27

XAMPP

Stacks143

Followers272

Votes6

XAMPP vs lighttpd: What are the differences?

Scalability: XAMPP is designed for personal and small business use, making it suitable for users who require an all-in-one solution for local development. On the other hand, lighttpd is lightweight and known for its scalability, making it ideal for high-traffic websites and applications that require efficient handling of multiple concurrent connections.
Speed and Performance: In terms of speed and performance, lighttpd is generally faster and more resource-efficient than XAMPP. Lighttpd is known for its low memory footprint and faster response times, making it a preferred choice for high-demand websites that require quick page loading and efficient resource utilization.
Operating System Support: XAMPP is available for multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing cross-platform compatibility for users. In contrast, lighttpd is primarily designed for Unix-like systems, such as Linux and BSD, which may limit its usage for users who require support for Windows-based environments.
Web Server Features: XAMPP includes a bundle of software components such as Apache, MySQL, PHP, and Perl, providing users with a comprehensive web server solution. Lighttpd, on the other hand, focuses primarily on web server functionality, offering a lightweight and efficient server without additional bundled software components.
Community and Support: XAMPP has a larger user base and community support, making it easier for users to find resources, tutorials, and assistance when using the software. Lighttpd, while well-supported by a dedicated community, may have a smaller user base compared to XAMPP, potentially impacting the availability of resources and support for users.
Configuration and Customization: XAMPP is user-friendly and comes with pre-configured settings, allowing users to set up a local development environment quickly and easily. In contrast, lighttpd may require more manual configuration and customization to optimize performance and tailor the server setup to specific requirements.

In Summary, XAMPP is ideal for personal and small business use with easy setup and a comprehensive bundle of software components, while lighttpd is preferred for high-traffic websites due to its scalability, speed, and efficiency in resource utilization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

lighttpd	XAMPP
lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.	It consists mainly of the Apache HTTP Server, MariaDB database, and interpreters for scripts written in the PHP and Perl programming languages.
Statistics
Stacks 156	Stacks 143
Followers 133	Followers 272
Votes 27	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Lightweight 6 Easy setup 2 Proxy 2 Virtal hosting 2 Simplicity	Pros 6 Easy set up and installation of files

What are some alternatives to lighttpd, XAMPP?

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

XAMPP vs lighttpd: What are the differences?

Scalability: XAMPP is designed for personal and small business use, making it suitable for users who require an all-in-one solution for local development. On the other hand, lighttpd is lightweight and known for its scalability, making it ideal for high-traffic websites and applications that require efficient handling of multiple concurrent connections.
Speed and Performance: In terms of speed and performance, lighttpd is generally faster and more resource-efficient than XAMPP. Lighttpd is known for its low memory footprint and faster response times, making it a preferred choice for high-demand websites that require quick page loading and efficient resource utilization.
Operating System Support: XAMPP is available for multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing cross-platform compatibility for users. In contrast, lighttpd is primarily designed for Unix-like systems, such as Linux and BSD, which may limit its usage for users who require support for Windows-based environments.
Web Server Features: XAMPP includes a bundle of software components such as Apache, MySQL, PHP, and Perl, providing users with a comprehensive web server solution. Lighttpd, on the other hand, focuses primarily on web server functionality, offering a lightweight and efficient server without additional bundled software components.
Community and Support: XAMPP has a larger user base and community support, making it easier for users to find resources, tutorials, and assistance when using the software. Lighttpd, while well-supported by a dedicated community, may have a smaller user base compared to XAMPP, potentially impacting the availability of resources and support for users.
Configuration and Customization: XAMPP is user-friendly and comes with pre-configured settings, allowing users to set up a local development environment quickly and easily. In contrast, lighttpd may require more manual configuration and customization to optimize performance and tailor the server setup to specific requirements.

XAMPP vs lighttpd

Overview