Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Puma vs lighttpd: What are the differences?
Introduction
In web development, choosing the right web server is crucial to achieving optimal performance. Puma and lighttpd are two popular web servers that each have their own strengths and weaknesses. Understanding the key differences between them can help developers make an informed decision on which to use for their projects.
Performance: Puma is known for its multi-threading capabilities, allowing it to handle a high volume of requests efficiently by utilizing all available CPU cores. On the other hand, lighttpd is known for its speed and low memory footprint, making it a better choice for serving static files or handling a large number of concurrent connections without consuming too many system resources.
Configuration: Puma is typically used with Ruby on Rails applications and can be easily configured through the Rails application configuration files. In contrast, lighttpd has a more complex configuration setup that is done through its configuration file, making it less user-friendly for beginners but more customizable for advanced users looking to fine-tune their server settings.
Flexibility: Puma is specifically designed to work well with Ruby applications and is commonly used in Ruby on Rails deployments. On the other hand, lighttpd is a more general-purpose web server that can be used with a wider variety of programming languages and frameworks, making it a versatile choice for different types of projects.
Logging and Monitoring: Puma provides detailed logging capabilities that allow developers to monitor and analyze server performance and troubleshoot issues effectively. Lighttpd also offers logging functionality but may require additional tools or configurations to achieve the same level of detailed monitoring as Puma.
Community Support: Puma has a strong community of Ruby on Rails developers who actively contribute to its development and provide support through forums, documentation, and online resources. Lighttpd also has a dedicated user base, but it may not have as extensive community support as Puma, particularly in the context of Ruby on Rails.
Security Features: Lighttpd is known for its robust security features, including support for SSL/TLS encryption, chroot() function to sandbox processes, and various security modules that can enhance server security. Puma, while not lacking in security features, may not have the same level of out-of-the-box security configurations as lighttpd.
In Summary, understanding the key differences between Puma and lighttpd, such as performance, configuration, flexibility, logging and monitoring, community support, and security features, can help developers make an informed decision on which web server to use for their specific web development projects.
I have an integration service that pulls data from third party systems saves it and returns it to the user of the service. We can pull large data sets with the service and response JSON can go up to 5MB with gzip compression. I currently use Rails 6 and Ruby 2.7.2 and Puma web server. Slow clients tend to prevent other users from accessing the system. Am considering a switch to Unicorn.
Consider trying to use puma workers first. puma -w basically. That will launch multiple puma processes to manage the requests, like unicorn, but also run threads within those processes. You can turn the number of workers and number of threads to find the right memory footprint / request per second balance.
Pros of lighttpd
- Lightweight7
- Easy setup6
- Virtal hosting2
- Simplicity2
- Full featured2
- Proxy2
- Open source2
- Available modules1
- Fast1
- Security1
- Ssl support1
Pros of Puma
- Free4
- Convenient3
- Easy3
- Multithreaded2
- Consumes less memory than Unicorn2
- Default Rails server2
- First-class support for WebSockets2
- Lightweight1
- Fast1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of lighttpd
Cons of Puma
- Uses `select` (limited client count)0
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is lighttpd?
What is Puma?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use lighttpd?
What companies use Puma?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with lighttpd?
What tools integrate with Puma?
Blog Posts
+39