StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Mongoose Web Server vs lighttpd

Mongoose Web Server vs lighttpd

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mongoose Web Server
Mongoose Web Server
Stacks12
Followers37
Votes3
GitHub Stars12.3K
Forks2.9K
lighttpd
lighttpd
Stacks156
Followers133
Votes27

Mongoose Web Server vs lighttpd: What are the differences?

Introduction

Mongoose Web Server and lighttpd are both popular web servers used for hosting websites and serving web content. While they serve a similar purpose, there are some key differences that set them apart from each other. In this comparison, we will highlight six specific differences between Mongoose Web Server and lighttpd.

  1. Architecture: Mongoose Web Server is built on an event-driven architecture, utilizing an event loop to handle incoming requests efficiently. On the other hand, lighttpd follows a more traditional multi-threaded architecture, where multiple threads are created to handle concurrent connections.

  2. Scalability: Mongoose Web Server is designed to handle a high number of concurrent connections efficiently due to its event-driven architecture and lightweight nature. It can scale well for applications with a large number of clients. In contrast, lighttpd might struggle to handle a similar level of concurrent connections due to its multi-threaded architecture, which can introduce more overhead in managing multiple threads.

  3. Configuration: Mongoose Web Server provides a simple and minimalistic configuration setup, allowing for quick and easy setup with fewer configuration parameters to consider. On the other hand, lighttpd offers a more advanced and feature-rich configuration system, allowing for fine-grained control over various server parameters.

  4. Modules and Plugins: Mongoose Web Server offers a limited set of built-in modules and plugins, focusing on providing essential functionalities out of the box. In comparison, lighttpd has a vast collection of modules and plugins available, allowing for easy extension and customization of the server's capabilities.

  5. Performance: Mongoose Web Server is known for its lightweight and efficient design, making it highly performant even under heavy loads. Its event-driven architecture allows for better resource utilization and improved response times. While lighttpd is also performant, the multi-threaded nature of its architecture might introduce more overhead in managing threads, impacting performance to some extent.

  6. Community and Support: Mongoose Web Server has a smaller community compared to lighttpd. While both web servers have an active community, lighttpd has been around for a longer time and has gained wider adoption, leading to a more extensive community and available resources for support.

In summary, Mongoose Web Server and lighttpd differ in terms of their architecture, scalability, configuration, available modules and plugins, performance, and community/support. While Mongoose Web Server excels in its lightweight and efficient design, lighttpd offers more advanced features and a larger community for support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mongoose Web Server
Mongoose Web Server
lighttpd
lighttpd

Mongoose is built on top of Libmongoose embedded library, which can turn anything into a web server in 5 minutes worth of effort and few lines of code. Libmongoose is used to serve Web GUI on embedded devices, implement RESTful services, RPC frameworks (e.g. JSON-RPC), handle telemetry data exchange, and perform many other tasks in various different industries including aerospace, manufacturing, finance, research, automotive, gaming, IT.

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
12
Stacks
156
Followers
37
Followers
133
Votes
3
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Light weight
  • 1
    Web server
  • 1
    Easy to configure
Pros
  • 7
    Lightweight
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Virtal hosting
  • 2
    Full featured
  • 2
    Proxy

What are some alternatives to Mongoose Web Server, lighttpd?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase