Laravel vs Materialize

Overview

Laravel

Stacks28.7K

Followers23.8K

Votes3.9K

GitHub Stars82.6K

Forks24.6K

Materialize

Stacks698

Followers1.2K

Votes557

GitHub Stars39.1K

Forks4.7K

Laravel vs Materialize: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Laravel and Materialize are two popular tools in web development with distinct features and applications. Here are the key differences between Laravel and Materialize:

Architecture and Purpose: Laravel is a PHP framework designed for building web applications with a strong emphasis on elegant syntax and ease of use, making it popular for rapid application development. Materialize, on the other hand, is a CSS framework based on Google's Material Design guidelines, focusing on creating responsive and visually appealing user interfaces.
Language Compatibility: Laravel primarily uses PHP for back-end development, while Materialize is solely a front-end framework based on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. This difference in language compatibility dictates the specific roles each tool plays in the web development process.
Feature Set: Laravel provides a comprehensive set of tools and features for managing routes, data migration, authentication, and other back-end functionalities, making it ideal for building complex web applications. Materialize, on the other hand, offers a range of pre-built components, such as grids, cards, and forms, that streamline front-end development tasks and ensure consistent design across different devices.
Community and Support: Laravel has a large and active community of developers who contribute to its continuous improvement through updates, plugins, and documentation. Materialize also has a supportive community, but its focus is more on providing resources for front-end design and customization rather than back-end development.
Learning Curve: Laravel has a steeper learning curve compared to Materialize, especially for beginners who may not have prior experience with PHP frameworks. Materialize, with its intuitive grid system and easy-to-use components, is more beginner-friendly and allows for faster prototyping of front-end designs.
Customization and Flexibility: Laravel offers extensive customization options for developers to tailor the framework to specific project requirements, enabling scalability and flexibility in building large, custom web applications. Materialize, while versatile in styling and theming, may have limitations in customization compared to a full-fledged back-end framework like Laravel.

In Summary, Laravel and Materialize differ in their architecture, language compatibility, feature set, community support, learning curve, and customization options, catering to distinct needs in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Laravel, Materialize

Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

Spring Boot

JavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k

Comments

washie

Developer at Bytecom

Jun 14, 2020

Decided

i find python quite resourceful. given the bulk of libraries that python has and the trends of the tech i find django which runs on python to be the framework of choice to the upcoming web services and application. Laravel on the other hand which is powered by PHP is also quite resourceful and great for startups and common web applications.

758k views758k

Comments

Mohammad

Oct 28, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

Laravel

PHP

I want to create a video sharing service like Youtube, which users can use to upload and watch videos. I prefer to use Vue.js for front-end. What do you suggest for the back-end? @{Node.js}|tool:1011| or @{Laravel}|tool:992| ( @{PHP}|tool:991| ) I need a good performance with high speed, and the most important thing is the ability to handle user's requests if the site's traffic increases. I want to create an algorithm that users who watch others videos earn points (randomly but in clear context) If you have anything else to improve, please let me know. For eg: If you prefer React to Vue.js. Thanks in advance

309k views309k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Laravel	Materialize
It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.	A CSS Framework based on material design.
Template Engine; MVC Architecture Support; Eloquent ORM (Object Relational Mapping); Security; Artisan; Libraries & Modular; Database Migration System; Unit-Testing	Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
Statistics
GitHub Stars 82.6K	GitHub Stars 39.1K
GitHub Forks 24.6K	GitHub Forks 4.7K
Stacks 28.7K	Stacks 698
Followers 23.8K	Followers 1.2K
Votes 3.9K	Votes 557
Pros & Cons
Pros 556 Clean architecture 393 Growing community 371 Composer friendly 345 Open source 326 The only framework to consider for php Cons 54 PHP 33 Too many dependency 23 Slower than the other two 17 A lot of static method calls for convenience 15 Too many include	Pros 102 Google material design 74 Easy to use 74 Responsive 54 Modern looks 48 Open source Cons 7 Mobile errors 6 Poor Grid System 2 Unmaintained
Integrations
PHP Django CodeIgniter CakePHP	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Laravel, Materialize?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Laravel vs Materialize: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Laravel and Materialize are two popular tools in web development with distinct features and applications. Here are the key differences between Laravel and Materialize:

Architecture and Purpose: Laravel is a PHP framework designed for building web applications with a strong emphasis on elegant syntax and ease of use, making it popular for rapid application development. Materialize, on the other hand, is a CSS framework based on Google's Material Design guidelines, focusing on creating responsive and visually appealing user interfaces.
Language Compatibility: Laravel primarily uses PHP for back-end development, while Materialize is solely a front-end framework based on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. This difference in language compatibility dictates the specific roles each tool plays in the web development process.
Feature Set: Laravel provides a comprehensive set of tools and features for managing routes, data migration, authentication, and other back-end functionalities, making it ideal for building complex web applications. Materialize, on the other hand, offers a range of pre-built components, such as grids, cards, and forms, that streamline front-end development tasks and ensure consistent design across different devices.
Community and Support: Laravel has a large and active community of developers who contribute to its continuous improvement through updates, plugins, and documentation. Materialize also has a supportive community, but its focus is more on providing resources for front-end design and customization rather than back-end development.
Learning Curve: Laravel has a steeper learning curve compared to Materialize, especially for beginners who may not have prior experience with PHP frameworks. Materialize, with its intuitive grid system and easy-to-use components, is more beginner-friendly and allows for faster prototyping of front-end designs.
Customization and Flexibility: Laravel offers extensive customization options for developers to tailor the framework to specific project requirements, enabling scalability and flexibility in building large, custom web applications. Materialize, while versatile in styling and theming, may have limitations in customization compared to a full-fledged back-end framework like Laravel.

Laravel vs Materialize

Overview