StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Server Configuration And Automation
  5. Laravel Forge vs Terraform

Laravel Forge vs Terraform

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Terraform
Terraform
Stacks22.9K
Followers14.7K
Votes344
GitHub Stars47.0K
Forks10.1K
Laravel Forge
Laravel Forge
Stacks233
Followers273
Votes4

Laravel Forge vs Terraform: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Laravel Forge and Terraform, outlining the key differences between the two.

  1. Deployment and Management: Laravel Forge is a platform that simplifies the deployment and management of web applications on cloud providers like AWS, DigitalOcean, and Linode. It provides a user-friendly interface for server provisioning and configuration. In contrast, Terraform is an infrastructure as code tool that enables the provisioning and management of cloud resources across different cloud providers. It allows for the creation of infrastructure in a declarative manner using a configuration language.

  2. Flexibility and Portability: Laravel Forge is specifically designed for PHP web application deployment and is tightly coupled with Laravel framework. It offers preconfigured server templates and easy integration with Laravel applications. On the other hand, Terraform is cloud provider-agnostic and supports a wide range of services and platforms. It provides a consistent way to manage infrastructure regardless of the cloud provider, making it more flexible and portable.

  3. Granularity of Control: Laravel Forge provides a high-level abstraction and automates many server management tasks, making it quick and easy to set up servers and deploy applications. However, it may limit the level of control and customization available for advanced configurations. In contrast, Terraform allows for fine-grained control over infrastructure provisioning, enabling users to define and manage resources with greater control and customization.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Laravel Forge has a strong community and ecosystem with extensive documentation, tutorials, and user support. It is specifically tailored for PHP and Laravel developers, offering a range of features and integrations for streamlined development workflows. On the other hand, Terraform has a larger and more diverse community due to its wider adoption and support for multiple cloud providers. It benefits from a more extensive ecosystem with a wide range of community-created modules and integrations.

  5. Learning Curve and Complexity: Laravel Forge is designed to be user-friendly and easy to use, particularly for Laravel developers familiar with the Laravel ecosystem. It provides a simpler and more intuitive interface, reducing the learning curve for deployment and management tasks. Conversely, Terraform has a steeper learning curve due to its more complex configuration language and broader scope. It requires a deeper understanding of infrastructure concepts and cloud provider-specific settings.

  6. Cost and Pricing: Laravel Forge offers a subscription-based pricing model, with different plans based on the number of servers and additional features. The cost is predictable and mainly depends on the requirements of the specific applications being deployed. Terraform, on the other hand, is an open-source tool and free to use. However, it may incur costs associated with the cloud resources provisioned using Terraform, depending on the cloud provider and the resources being used.

In summary, Laravel Forge is a specialized platform for PHP web application deployment, providing a user-friendly interface and seamless integration with Laravel applications. Terraform, on the other hand, is a flexible and cloud provider-agnostic infrastructure as code tool, allowing for fine-grained control and portability across different cloud platforms.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Terraform, Laravel Forge

Sung Won
Sung Won

Nov 4, 2019

DecidedonGoogle Cloud IoT CoreGoogle Cloud IoT CoreTerraformTerraformPythonPython

Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

Check out the GitHub repo attached

2.25M views2.25M
Comments
Timothy
Timothy

SRE

Mar 20, 2020

Decided

I personally am not a huge fan of vendor lock in for multiple reasons:

  • I've seen cost saving moves to the cloud end up costing a fortune and trapping companies due to over utilization of cloud specific features.
  • I've seen S3 failures nearly take down half the internet.
  • I've seen companies get stuck in the cloud because they aren't built cloud agnostic.

I choose to use terraform for my cloud provisioning for these reasons:

  • It's cloud agnostic so I can use it no matter where I am.
  • It isn't difficult to use and uses a relatively easy to read language.
  • It tests infrastructure before running it, and enables me to see and keep changes up to date.
  • It runs from the same CLI I do most of my CM work from.
385k views385k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

May 4, 2020

Decided

Because Pulumi uses real programming languages, you can actually write abstractions for your infrastructure code, which is incredibly empowering. You still 'describe' your desired state, but by having a programming language at your fingers, you can factor out patterns, and package it up for easier consumption.

426k views426k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Terraform
Terraform
Laravel Forge
Laravel Forge

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Provision, host, and deploy PHP applications on AWS, DigitalOcean, and Linode.

Infrastructure as Code: Infrastructure is described using a high-level configuration syntax. This allows a blueprint of your datacenter to be versioned and treated as you would any other code. Additionally, infrastructure can be shared and re-used.;Execution Plans: Terraform has a "planning" step where it generates an execution plan. The execution plan shows what Terraform will do when you call apply. This lets you avoid any surprises when Terraform manipulates infrastructure.;Resource Graph: Terraform builds a graph of all your resources, and parallelizes the creation and modification of any non-dependent resources. Because of this, Terraform builds infrastructure as efficiently as possible, and operators get insight into dependencies in their infrastructure.;Change Automation: Complex changesets can be applied to your infrastructure with minimal human interaction. With the previously mentioned execution plan and resource graph, you know exactly what Terraform will change and in what order, avoiding many possible human errors
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
47.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
10.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
22.9K
Stacks
233
Followers
14.7K
Followers
273
Votes
344
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 121
    Infrastructure as code
  • 73
    Declarative syntax
  • 45
    Planning
  • 28
    Simple
  • 24
    Parallelism
Cons
  • 1
    Doesn't have full support to GKE
Pros
  • 4
    Simply to use
Cons
  • 2
    Monthly subscription
Integrations
Heroku
Heroku
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
DNSimple
DNSimple
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Consul
Consul
Equinix Metal
Equinix Metal
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
OpenStack
OpenStack
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Terraform, Laravel Forge?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Fabric

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.

Distelli

Distelli

Build, test, and deploy your code from GitHub and BitBucket (or no repository at all) to any server in the world regardless of provider. Distelli customers iterate and ship faster with complete transparency.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana