Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Materialize vs Kube: What are the differences?
Developers describe Materialize as "A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design". A CSS Framework based on material design. On the other hand, Kube is detailed as "Built and designed to provide the most flexible yet powerful CSS framework to the community". As a complete and self-sufficient web framework, it is here to help you get the most out of your daily work. It takes care of routine stuff, saving you precious time for things that you love.
Materialize and Kube belong to "Front-End Frameworks" category of the tech stack.
Some of the features offered by Materialize are:
- Speeds up development
- User Experience Focused
- Easy to work with
On the other hand, Kube provides the following key features:
- Dynamic loading of modules
- SASS development
- Basic Template
Materialize and Kube are both open source tools. It seems that Materialize with 36.5K GitHub stars and 4.82K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Kube with 1.31K GitHub stars and 206 GitHub forks.
Pros of Kube
Pros of Materialize
- Google material design102
- Easy to use74
- Responsive74
- Modern looks54
- Open source48
- Good documentation42
- Code examples37
- Extremely light - 29kb29
- Flexible28
- Great Support15
- It looks beautiful10
- Very nice looking components to quickly build out8
- Smooth animation7
- Great Grid System6
- Great4
- Ruby gem to integrate in 2 seconds flat4
- Angular2 Support3
- MIT Lisence2
- Friendly api, easy setup, good documentation2
- Easy setup2
- React1
- Grid system1
- Because of the easy to use and very editable library1
- Responsivness1
- Jibberish1
- Friendly Api1
- Better class name0
- Rtl support0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Kube
Cons of Materialize
- Mobile errors7
- Poor Grid System6
- Unmaintained2