StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Koa vs Restify

Koa vs Restify

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Koa
Koa
Stacks812
Followers483
Votes12
GitHub Stars35.7K
Forks3.2K
Restify
Restify
Stacks86
Followers129
Votes1

Koa vs Restify: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Koa and Restify. Both Koa and Restify are popular web frameworks based on Node.js, but they have some distinct features and use cases.

  1. Routing and Middleware Handling: Koa uses middleware functions to handle requests and responses, allowing for a more modular and composable approach. Restify, on the other hand, follows a more traditional routing model where routes are defined explicitly and middleware is added to those routes. This makes Koa more flexible and customizable, while Restify is focused on simplicity and ease of use.

  2. Asynchronous Programming: Koa leverages the power of generators and async/await syntax to simplify asynchronous programming. It provides a more natural flow of control and error handling. Restify, on the other hand, uses traditional callbacks and promises for handling asynchronous operations. This makes Koa more suitable for applications that heavily rely on asynchronous programming.

  3. Error Handling: Koa provides a built-in error handling mechanism that allows developers to gracefully handle errors within the middleware stack. It provides a separate context for error handling and allows for easy propagation of error messages. Restify also has error handling capabilities, but its focus is more on returning standard HTTP error codes. Koa's error handling mechanism provides more control and flexibility in handling errors.

  4. HTTP Method Override: Koa has built-in support for method override, which allows clients to issue requests with non-standard HTTP methods (e.g., PUT, PATCH, DELETE) using query parameters or request headers. Restify, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for method override and relies on the standard HTTP methods only.

  5. Websocket Support: Koa does not have built-in support for Websockets, but it can be easily integrated with other libraries or middleware to add WebSocket functionality. Restify, on the other hand, provides built-in support for Websockets out of the box. If your application requires WebSocket support, Restify might be a better choice.

  6. Community and Popularity: Koa has gained significant popularity in recent years and has a growing community of developers. It has a rich ecosystem of middleware and plugins available. Restify, on the other hand, has been around for a longer time and has a more established user base. It has a smaller community compared to Koa, but it is still actively maintained and used in production by many companies.

In summary, Koa and Restify have different approaches and use cases. Koa provides more flexibility, asynchronous programming support, and error handling capabilities, while Restify focuses on simplicity, HTTP method handling, and WebSocket support. Depending on your project requirements and preferences, you can choose the one that best suits your needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Koa
Koa
Restify
Restify

Koa aims to be a smaller, more expressive, and more robust foundation for web applications and APIs. Through leveraging generators Koa allows you to ditch callbacks and greatly increase error-handling. Koa does not bundle any middleware.

A Node.js web service framework optimized for building semantically correct RESTful web services ready for production use at scale. it optimizes for introspection and performance.

Provides 3 different kinds of functions as middleware; common function; async function; generator function
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
35.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
812
Stacks
86
Followers
483
Followers
129
Votes
12
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Async/Await
  • 5
    JavaScript
  • 1
    REST API
Pros
  • 1
    Semantically REST correctness
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Koa, Restify?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase