StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Kafka vs PostgreSQL

Kafka vs PostgreSQL

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Stacks103.0K
Followers83.9K
Votes3.6K
GitHub Stars19.0K
Forks5.2K
Kafka
Kafka
Stacks24.2K
Followers22.3K
Votes607
GitHub Stars31.2K
Forks14.8K

Kafka vs PostgreSQL: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this article, we will explore the key differences between Kafka and PostgreSQL, two widely used technologies in the data processing and storage space.

  1. Data Streaming vs Relational Database: Kafka is a distributed streaming platform that allows real-time data processing and messaging across different systems, while PostgreSQL is a relational database management system that stores structured data following ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) principles. Kafka is more suitable for handling high-throughput, real-time streaming data, whereas PostgreSQL is designed for storing and retrieving structured data with complex relationships.

  2. Data Model: Kafka uses a publish-subscribe messaging model, where producers publish messages to topics, and consumers subscribe to these topics to consume the messages. Data is processed in real-time as it flows through the Kafka pipeline. On the other hand, PostgreSQL stores data in tables with defined schema, allowing for complex data modeling, relationships, and querying capabilities using SQL.

  3. Scalability: Kafka is built for high scalability and can handle millions of events per second distributed across multiple nodes. It is horizontally scalable, meaning more nodes can be added to the cluster to increase throughput and storage capacity. PostgreSQL, on the other hand, can also be scaled horizontally by sharding the data across multiple databases, but it requires more manual configuration and management compared to Kafka's built-in scalability features.

  4. Data Durability: Kafka ensures data durability by persisting messages to disk and replicating them across multiple Kafka nodes in a cluster. This ensures that even if a node fails, messages are not lost. PostgreSQL also provides data durability through transaction logs and write-ahead logging, ensuring that committed changes are not lost in case of failures.

  5. Data Processing Paradigm: Kafka follows a publish-subscribe model where messages flow through topics and consumers can process them as they arrive. It allows for real-time data processing using stream processing frameworks like Apache Spark or Apache Flink. PostgreSQL, on the other hand, is primarily designed for batch processing and querying of structured data using SQL.

  6. Use Cases: Kafka is commonly used in scenarios where real-time streaming data processing is required, such as log aggregation, event sourcing, and real-time analytics. It excels in handling high volumes of data and enabling decoupled, scalable architectures. PostgreSQL, on the other hand, is ideal for applications that require complex data modeling, structured querying, and adherence to the ACID principles, such as e-commerce platforms, financial systems, and content management systems.

In summary, Kafka is a distributed streaming platform designed for handling real-time, high-throughput data streams, while PostgreSQL is a relational database system optimized for structured data storage, querying, and complex relationships.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on PostgreSQL, Kafka

Kyle
Kyle

Web Application Developer at Redacted DevWorks

Dec 3, 2019

DecidedonPostGISPostGIS

While there's been some very clever techniques that has allowed non-natively supported geo querying to be performed, it is incredibly slow in the long game and error prone at best.

MySQL finally introduced it's own GEO functions and special indexing operations for GIS type data. I prototyped with this, as MySQL is the most familiar database to me. But no matter what I did with it, how much tuning i'd give it, how much I played with it, the results would come back inconsistent.

It was very disappointing.

I figured, at this point, that SQL Server, being an enterprise solution authored by one of the biggest worldwide software developers in the world, Microsoft, might contain some decent GIS in it.

I was very disappointed.

Postgres is a Database solution i'm still getting familiar with, but I noticed it had no built in support for GIS. So I hilariously didn't pay it too much attention. That was until I stumbled upon PostGIS and my world changed forever.

449k views449k
Comments
George
George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQLPythonPythonDjangoDjango

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k
Comments
viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Kafka
Kafka

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

-
Written at LinkedIn in Scala;Used by LinkedIn to offload processing of all page and other views;Defaults to using persistence, uses OS disk cache for hot data (has higher throughput then any of the above having persistence enabled);Supports both on-line as off-line processing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
19.0K
GitHub Stars
31.2K
GitHub Forks
5.2K
GitHub Forks
14.8K
Stacks
103.0K
Stacks
24.2K
Followers
83.9K
Followers
22.3K
Votes
3.6K
Votes
607
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 765
    Relational database
  • 511
    High availability
  • 439
    Enterprise class database
  • 383
    Sql
  • 304
    Sql + nosql
Cons
  • 10
    Table/index bloatings
Pros
  • 126
    High-throughput
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 92
    Scalable
  • 86
    High-Performance
  • 66
    Durable
Cons
  • 32
    Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
  • 29
    Needs Zookeeper
  • 9
    Operational difficulties
  • 5
    Terrible Packaging

What are some alternatives to PostgreSQL, Kafka?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase