StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Kafka vs MarkLogic

Kafka vs MarkLogic

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kafka
Kafka
Stacks24.2K
Followers22.3K
Votes607
GitHub Stars31.2K
Forks14.8K
MarkLogic
MarkLogic
Stacks43
Followers71
Votes26

Kafka vs MarkLogic: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Kafka and MarkLogic, it is essential to understand the key differences between these two technologies to make an informed decision on which one suits your specific needs.

  1. Data Processing Approach: Kafka is a distributed streaming platform that focuses on high-throughput ingestion and low-latency message delivery, making it ideal for real-time data processing and event streaming. On the other hand, MarkLogic is a NoSQL database used for storing, managing, and searching structured and unstructured data in a highly secure environment.

  2. Data Model: Kafka stores data in topics, which are then partitioned and replicated across clusters for fault tolerance and scalability. It follows a publish-subscribe model for message distribution. MarkLogic, on the other hand, stores data in a document-centric model, where documents are self-describing and can be stored in a variety of formats (XML, JSON, RDF, etc.), enabling flexibility in data storage and retrieval.

  3. Querying Capabilities: Kafka does not provide built-in querying capabilities; it is primarily used for data streaming and message passing. MarkLogic, on the other hand, offers powerful querying capabilities through its search and indexing features, enabling users to perform complex searches, aggregations, and analytics on their data.

  4. Consistency and Transactions: MarkLogic ensures ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) compliance for transactions, making it a robust choice for applications requiring strong consistency guarantees. Kafka, being a distributed messaging system, focuses more on availability and partition tolerance, sacrificing some level of consistency in favor of high availability.

  5. Use Cases: Kafka is generally used for real-time data processing, log aggregation, stream processing, event sourcing, and messaging. MarkLogic, on the other hand, is commonly used in applications requiring data integration, content management, metadata management, and search applications that deal with large volumes of structured and unstructured data.

  6. Scalability: Kafka is designed for horizontal scalability, allowing users to add more brokers to the cluster to handle increased load and data throughput. MarkLogic also supports horizontal scalability through clustering, enabling the distribution of data and workload across multiple nodes for improved performance and reliability.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Kafka and MarkLogic is crucial for selecting the right technology based on the specific requirements of your data management and processing needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Kafka, MarkLogic

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
Ishfaq
Ishfaq

Feb 28, 2020

Needs advice

Our backend application is sending some external messages to a third party application at the end of each backend (CRUD) API call (from UI) and these external messages take too much extra time (message building, processing, then sent to the third party and log success/failure), UI application has no concern to these extra third party messages.

So currently we are sending these third party messages by creating a new child thread at end of each REST API call so UI application doesn't wait for these extra third party API calls.

I want to integrate Apache Kafka for these extra third party API calls, so I can also retry on failover third party API calls in a queue(currently third party messages are sending from multiple threads at the same time which uses too much processing and resources) and logging, etc.

Question 1: Is this a use case of a message broker?

Question 2: If it is then Kafka vs RabitMQ which is the better?

804k views804k
Comments
Roman
Roman

Senior Back-End Developer, Software Architect

Feb 12, 2019

ReviewonKafkaKafka

I use Kafka because it has almost infinite scaleability in terms of processing events (could be scaled to process hundreds of thousands of events), great monitoring (all sorts of metrics are exposed via JMX).

Downsides of using Kafka are:

  • you have to deal with Zookeeper
  • you have to implement advanced routing yourself (compared to RabbitMQ it has no advanced routing)
10.9k views10.9k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Kafka
Kafka
MarkLogic
MarkLogic

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

MarkLogic is the only Enterprise NoSQL database, bringing all the features you need into one unified system: a document-centric, schema-agnostic, structure-aware, clustered, transactional, secure, database server with built-in search and a full suite of application services.

Written at LinkedIn in Scala;Used by LinkedIn to offload processing of all page and other views;Defaults to using persistence, uses OS disk cache for hot data (has higher throughput then any of the above having persistence enabled);Supports both on-line as off-line processing
Search and Query;ACID Transactions;High Availability and Disaster Recovery;Replication;Government-grade Security;Scalability and Elasticity;On-premise or Cloud Deployment;Hadoop for Storage and Compute;Semantics;Faster Time-to-Results
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
14.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
24.2K
Stacks
43
Followers
22.3K
Followers
71
Votes
607
Votes
26
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 126
    High-throughput
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 92
    Scalable
  • 86
    High-Performance
  • 66
    Durable
Cons
  • 32
    Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
  • 29
    Needs Zookeeper
  • 9
    Operational difficulties
  • 5
    Terrible Packaging
Pros
  • 5
    RDF Triples
  • 3
    JavaScript
  • 3
    Marklogic is absolutely stable and very fast
  • 3
    JSON
  • 3
    Enterprise

What are some alternatives to Kafka, MarkLogic?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase