StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Rancher vs k3s

Rancher vs k3s

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rancher
Rancher
Stacks952
Followers1.5K
Votes644
k3s
k3s
Stacks97
Followers252
Votes16

Rancher vs k3s: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Rancher and k3s

Rancher and k3s are both container orchestration platforms, but they have several key differences.

  1. Architecture: Rancher is built on top of Kubernetes and provides a rich set of features for managing and scaling clusters. On the other hand, k3s is a lightweight Kubernetes distribution designed for resource-constrained environments with reduced memory and CPU requirements.

  2. Resource Usage: Rancher requires more resources to run compared to k3s. Rancher's feature-rich nature makes it more suitable for larger-scale deployments where resource availability is not a constraint. Conversely, k3s is optimized for low-resource environments such as edge computing or IoT devices.

  3. Installation Complexity: Rancher installation involves setting up a Rancher server and then creating and managing Kubernetes clusters within it. This requires more steps and configuration compared to k3s, which can be quickly installed with a single command and includes a built-in Kubernetes cluster.

  4. Maintenance and Upgrades: Rancher provides a robust management UI and extensive features for cluster management, monitoring, logging, and more, making it easier to manage and upgrade clusters. On the other hand, k3s offers a minimalistic approach, which can make maintenance and upgrades more hands-on and manual.

  5. Production Readiness: Rancher is widely adopted and has been battle-tested in large-scale production deployments. It offers a mature feature set, extensive ecosystem integrations, and active community support. While k3s is rapidly gaining popularity, it is relatively newer and might not have all the features or ecosystem support needed for highly complex production use cases.

  6. Community and Support: Rancher has a large and active community, with regular releases, updates, and a vibrant ecosystem of plugins and third-party integrations. K3s is also backed by Rancher Labs but being a newer project, it might have a smaller user base and ecosystem support.

In Summary, Rancher is a feature-rich Kubernetes management platform suitable for larger deployments, while k3s is a lightweight, resource-efficient distribution designed for low-resource environments and edge computing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rancher
Rancher
k3s
k3s

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Manage Hosts, Deploy Containers, Monitor Resources;User Management & Collaboration;Native Docker APIs & Tools;Monitoring and Logging;Connect Containers, Manage Disks, Deploy Load Balancers;Docker App Catalog; Included Kubernetes Distribution;Included Docker Swarm Distribution; Included Mesos Distribution;Infrastructure Management
ARM64 and ARMv7 support; Simplified installation; SQLite3 support; etcd support; Automatic Manifest and Helm Chart management; containerd, CoreDNS, Flannel support
Statistics
Stacks
952
Stacks
97
Followers
1.5K
Followers
252
Votes
644
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 103
    Easy to use
  • 79
    Open source and totally free
  • 63
    Multi-host docker-compose support
  • 58
    Load balancing and health check included
  • 58
    Simple
Cons
  • 10
    Hosting Rancher can be complicated
Pros
  • 6
    Lightweight
  • 4
    Easy
  • 2
    Open Source
  • 2
    Replication Controller
  • 2
    Scale Services
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
Datadog
Datadog
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Drone.io
Drone.io
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
SQLite
SQLite

What are some alternatives to Rancher, k3s?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Docker Machine

Docker Machine

Machine lets you create Docker hosts on your computer, on cloud providers, and inside your own data center. It creates servers, installs Docker on them, then configures the Docker client to talk to them.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana