Julia vs Scala

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Julia

642
665
+ 1
166
Scala

11.7K
7.6K
+ 1
1.5K
Add tool

Julia vs Scala: What are the differences?

  1. 1. Syntax: One key difference between Julia and Scala is their syntax. Julia has a simple and flexible syntax, similar to Python, which makes it easy to read and write code. On the other hand, Scala has a more complex syntax that blends functional and object-oriented programming paradigms, making it more powerful for certain use cases but also more difficult for beginners to grasp.

  2. 2. Type System: Another major difference between Julia and Scala is their type systems. Julia is a dynamically typed language, which means that variables can hold values of any type and their type can change at runtime. This flexibility allows for more concise code but can also lead to potential runtime errors. Scala, on the other hand, is a statically typed language, which means that variables must have a specific type at compile time. This enforced type safety can prevent many common programming mistakes but can also make the code more verbose.

  3. 3. Performance: Julia and Scala also differ in terms of performance. Julia is designed to be a high-performance language, with a just-in-time (JIT) compiler that optimizes code execution. This makes Julia well-suited for scientific computing and numerical simulations, where performance is crucial. Scala, on the other hand, is not as optimized for performance as Julia, but it runs on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), which allows it to leverage the vast ecosystem of Java libraries and frameworks.

  4. 4. Concurrency: Concurrency is another area where Julia and Scala differ. Julia has built-in support for lightweight threading, allowing multiple tasks to run concurrently. This makes it easy to write parallel code and take full advantage of modern multi-core processors. Scala, on the other hand, has a more complex concurrency model based on the Actor model, which allows developers to write scalable and fault-tolerant concurrent applications. This model requires more advanced knowledge and can be more difficult to master.

  5. 5. Community and Ecosystem: Julia and Scala also differ in terms of their community and ecosystem. Julia is a relatively new language with a growing but smaller community compared to Scala. However, Julia has gained popularity in the scientific computing community and has a growing ecosystem of packages and libraries tailored for scientific and data analysis tasks. Scala, on the other hand, has a larger and more mature community, with a wide range of libraries and frameworks available for web development, data processing, and other domains.

  6. 6. Learning Curve: The learning curve of Julia and Scala is another significant difference. Julia has a relatively low learning curve, especially for scientists and engineers familiar with Python or MATLAB, due to its simple syntax and high-level abstractions. On the other hand, Scala has a steeper learning curve, mainly because of its complex syntax and the need to understand functional programming concepts. Scala is more suitable for developers with a strong background in programming and experience with object-oriented or functional languages.

In Summary, Julia and Scala differ in syntax, type system, performance, concurrency model, community and ecosystem, and learning curve.

Advice on Julia and Scala
Needs advice
on
GolangGolangNode.jsNode.js
and
ScalaScala

Finding the best server-side tool for building a personal information organizer that focuses on performance, simplicity, and scalability.

performance and scalability get a prototype going fast by keeping codebase simple find hosting that is affordable and scales well (Java/Scala-based ones might not be affordable)

See more
Replies (1)
David Annez
VP Product at loveholidays · | 5 upvotes · 290.8K views
Recommends
on
Node.jsNode.js
at

I've picked Node.js here but honestly it's a toss up between that and Go around this. It really depends on your background and skillset around "get something going fast" for one of these languages. Based on not knowing that I've suggested Node because it can be easier to prototype quickly and built right is performant enough. The scaffolding provided around Node.js services (Koa, Restify, NestJS) means you can get up and running pretty easily. It's important to note that the tooling surrounding this is good also, such as tracing, metrics et al (important when you're building production ready services).

You'll get more scalability and perf from go, but balancing them out I would say that you'll get pretty far with a well built Node.JS service (our entire site with over 1.5k requests/m scales easily and holds it's own with 4 pods in production.

Without knowing the scale you are building for and the systems you are using around it it's hard to say for certain this is the right route.

See more
Decisions about Julia and Scala
Chose
PythonPython
over
ScalaScala

I am working in the domain of big data and machine learning. I am helping companies with bringing their machine learning models to the production. In many projects there is a tendency to port Python, PySpark code to Scala and Scala Spark.

This yields to longer time to market and a lot of mistakes due to necessity to understand and re-write the code. Also many libraries/apis that data scientists/machine learning practitioners use are not available in jvm ecosystem.

Simply, refactoring (if necessary) and organising the code of the data scientists by following best practices of software development is less error prone and faster comparing to re-write in Scala.

Pipeline orchestration tools such as Luigi/Airflow is python native and fits well to this picture.

I have heard some arguments against Python such as, it is slow, or it is hard to maintain due to its dynamically typed language. However cost/benefit of time consumed porting python code to java/scala alone would be enough as a counter-argument. ML pipelines rarerly contains a lot of code (if that is not the case, such as complex domain and significant amount of code, then scala would be a better fit).

In terms of performance, I did not see any issues with Python. It is not the fastest runtime around but ML applications are rarely time-critical (majority of them is batch based).

I still prefer Scala for developing APIs and for applications where the domain contains complex logic.

See more
Alexander Nozik
Senior researcher at MIPT · | 3 upvotes · 169.5K views
Migrated
from
JuliaJulia
to
KotlinKotlin

After writing a project in Julia we decided to stick with Kotlin. Julia is a nice language and has superb REPL support, but poor tooling and the lack of reproducibility of the program runs makes it too expensive to work with. Kotlin on the other hand now has nice Jupyter support, which mostly covers REPL requirements.

See more

We needed to incorporate Big Data Framework for data stream analysis, specifically Apache Spark / Apache Storm. The three options of languages were most suitable for the job - Python, Java, Scala.

The winner was Python for the top of the class, high-performance data analysis libraries (NumPy, Pandas) written in C, quick learning curve, quick prototyping allowance, and a great connection with other future tools for machine learning as Tensorflow.

The whole code was shorter & more readable which made it easier to develop and maintain.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Julia
Pros of Scala
  • 24
    Fast Performance and Easy Experimentation
  • 21
    Designed for parallelism and distributed computation
  • 18
    Free and Open Source
  • 17
    Dynamic Type System
  • 16
    Multiple Dispatch
  • 16
    Calling C functions directly
  • 16
    Lisp-like Macros
  • 10
    Powerful Shell-like Capabilities
  • 9
    Jupyter notebook integration
  • 8
    REPL
  • 4
    String handling
  • 4
    Emojis as variable names
  • 3
    Interoperability
  • 187
    Static typing
  • 178
    Pattern-matching
  • 177
    Jvm
  • 172
    Scala is fun
  • 138
    Types
  • 95
    Concurrency
  • 88
    Actor library
  • 86
    Solve functional problems
  • 81
    Open source
  • 80
    Solve concurrency in a safer way
  • 44
    Functional
  • 24
    Fast
  • 23
    Generics
  • 18
    It makes me a better engineer
  • 17
    Syntactic sugar
  • 13
    Scalable
  • 10
    First-class functions
  • 10
    Type safety
  • 9
    Interactive REPL
  • 8
    Expressive
  • 7
    SBT
  • 6
    Case classes
  • 6
    Implicit parameters
  • 4
    Rapid and Safe Development using Functional Programming
  • 4
    JVM, OOP and Functional programming, and static typing
  • 4
    Object-oriented
  • 4
    Used by Twitter
  • 3
    Functional Proframming
  • 2
    Spark
  • 2
    Beautiful Code
  • 2
    Safety
  • 2
    Growing Community
  • 1
    DSL
  • 1
    Rich Static Types System and great Concurrency support
  • 1
    Naturally enforce high code quality
  • 1
    Akka Streams
  • 1
    Akka
  • 1
    Reactive Streams
  • 1
    Easy embedded DSLs
  • 1
    Mill build tool
  • 0
    Freedom to choose the right tools for a job

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Julia
Cons of Scala
  • 5
    Immature library management system
  • 4
    Slow program start
  • 3
    JIT compiler is very slow
  • 3
    Poor backwards compatibility
  • 2
    Bad tooling
  • 2
    No static compilation
  • 11
    Slow compilation time
  • 7
    Multiple ropes and styles to hang your self
  • 6
    Too few developers available
  • 4
    Complicated subtyping
  • 2
    My coworkers using scala are racist against other stuff

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What companies use Julia?
What companies use Scala?
See which teams inside your own company are using Julia or Scala.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Julia?
What tools integrate with Scala?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Julia and Scala?
Python
Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.
R Language
R provides a wide variety of statistical (linear and nonlinear modelling, classical statistical tests, time-series analysis, classification, clustering, ...) and graphical techniques, and is highly extensible.
MATLAB
Using MATLAB, you can analyze data, develop algorithms, and create models and applications. The language, tools, and built-in math functions enable you to explore multiple approaches and reach a solution faster than with spreadsheets or traditional programming languages, such as C/C++ or Java.
Rust
Rust is a systems programming language that combines strong compile-time correctness guarantees with fast performance. It improves upon the ideas of other systems languages like C++ by providing guaranteed memory safety (no crashes, no data races) and complete control over the lifecycle of memory.
Golang
Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.
See all alternatives