StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. Julia vs PyPy

Julia vs PyPy

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Julia
Julia
Stacks666
Followers677
Votes171
GitHub Stars47.9K
Forks5.7K
PyPy
PyPy
Stacks15
Followers35
Votes0

Julia vs PyPy: What are the differences?

Introduction: Here, we will discuss the key differences between Julia and PyPy, highlighting their unique features and capabilities.

  1. Performance: Julia is renowned for its high-performance capabilities, often competing with low-level languages like C and Fortran. It achieves this by a JIT (Just-In-Time) compilation approach combined with its multiple dispatch feature, allowing efficient polymorphism. On the other hand, PyPy focuses on speeding up the execution of Python code through its dynamic translation approach, providing an enhanced performance compared to the reference CPython interpreter.

  2. Language Focus: Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language specifically designed for technical computing, numerical analysis, and data science applications. It aims to provide an easy-to-use language with the performance of low-level languages. In contrast, PyPy is an alternative implementation of the Python language itself, aiming to improve its performance and execution speed without compromising compatibility.

  3. Garbage Collection: In Julia, a generational garbage collector is utilized, which periodically performs memory reclamation on allocated objects. This helps manage memory efficiently and ensures optimal performance. On the other hand, PyPy also employs a sophisticated garbage collection mechanism, but it offers more flexibility in choosing different garbage collectors, such as reference counting or a hybrid approach, depending on the specific use case.

  4. Type System: Julia embraces a powerful type system allowing users to define custom types and specifying type constraints for function arguments. It supports multiple dispatch, enabling polymorphism based on function argument types. In contrast, PyPy, being an alternative implementation of the Python language, inherits the dynamic and duck typing nature of Python, making it convenient and flexible for dynamic programming.

  5. Compatibility and Ecosystem: Whilst Julia has a growing and active community, it still has a relatively smaller user base compared to PyPy. As a result, the Julia ecosystem, including libraries and packages, might not be as extensive or mature as that of PyPy, which benefits from the broad adoption and support of the Python ecosystem, offering a vast range of libraries and frameworks for various domains.

  6. Interoperability and Integration: Julia provides a solid interoperability layer, allowing seamless integration with other programming languages like Python, C, and Java, enabling users to leverage existing code and libraries. On the other hand, PyPy, being a Python alternative, seamlessly integrates with the existing Python ecosystem and libraries, facilitating code reuse and compatibility.

In Summary, Julia emphasizes high-performance computing with an efficient type system and memory management, while PyPy focuses on enhancing Python's execution speed and compatibility with its versatile garbage collection options and extensive ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Julia
Julia
PyPy
PyPy

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

It is a very compliant implementation of the Python language, featuring a JIT compiler. It runs code about 7 times faster than CPython.

-
JIT compiler; real GC; low memory usage; easy interfacing with C
Statistics
GitHub Stars
47.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
666
Stacks
15
Followers
677
Followers
35
Votes
171
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 25
    Fast Performance and Easy Experimentation
  • 22
    Designed for parallelism and distributed computation
  • 19
    Free and Open Source
  • 17
    Dynamic Type System
  • 17
    Calling C functions directly
Cons
  • 5
    Immature library management system
  • 4
    Slow program start
  • 3
    Poor backwards compatibility
  • 3
    JIT compiler is very slow
  • 2
    Bad tooling
No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Azure Web App for Containers
Azure Web App for Containers
GitLab
GitLab
Slack
Slack
C++
C++
Rust
Rust
C lang
C lang
Stack Overflow
Stack Overflow
vscode.dev
vscode.dev
Python
Python
IPython
IPython
Django
Django
Flask
Flask
PyCharm
PyCharm

What are some alternatives to Julia, PyPy?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot