Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
jQuery vs vue-next: What are the differences?
Introduction: In web development, jQuery and vue-next are popular tools used by developers for front-end development. Understanding the key differences between the two can help developers make informed decisions when choosing the right technology for their projects.
Performance: One key difference between jQuery and vue-next is performance. jQuery utilizes DOM manipulation directly, which can lead to slower rendering and performance issues when dealing with complex user interfaces. On the other hand, vue-next utilizes a virtual DOM, which allows for efficient updates and rendering, resulting in better performance and user experience.
Data Binding: Another significant difference is in how data binding is handled. jQuery does not provide built-in data binding capabilities, requiring developers to manually update the DOM when the data changes. In contrast, vue-next offers two-way data binding, simplifying the process of synchronizing the data between the view and the model.
Component-Based Architecture: vue-next follows a component-based architecture, where UI components are reusable and encapsulated, promoting code reusability and maintainability. jQuery, on the other hand, primarily focuses on DOM manipulation without a clear separation of concerns, leading to code complexity and difficulty in managing larger projects.
State Management: In terms of state management, vue-next comes with a built-in state management solution called Vuex, which helps manage the state of the application in a predictable and centralized manner. jQuery, however, lacks native support for state management, requiring developers to rely on external libraries or custom solutions, leading to potential inconsistencies and bugs in state management.
Community and Ecosystem: The respective communities and ecosystems of jQuery and vue-next differ significantly. jQuery has been around for a longer time and has a large ecosystem with numerous plugins and resources available. In contrast, vue-next, being a more modern framework, has a growing community with a focus on newer development practices and technologies, offering more up-to-date solutions to common front-end challenges.
Learning Curve: When it comes to the learning curve, jQuery is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it accessible to beginners and experienced developers alike. Vue-next, while user-friendly, introduces concepts like components, directives, and state management that may require a bit more time and effort to grasp for those new to the framework.
In Summary, understanding the key differences between jQuery and vue-next in terms of performance, data binding, architecture, state management, community, ecosystem, and learning curve can help developers choose the right tool for their front-end development projects.
The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!
What do you think?
I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source. So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?
When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.
I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.
Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.
I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.
Pros of jQuery
- Cross-browser1.3K
- Dom manipulation957
- Power809
- Open source660
- Plugins610
- Easy459
- Popular395
- Feature-rich350
- Html5281
- Light weight227
- Simple93
- Great community84
- CSS3 Compliant79
- Mobile friendly69
- Fast67
- Intuitive43
- Swiss Army knife for webdev42
- Huge Community35
- Easy to learn11
- Clean code4
- Because of Ajax request :)3
- Powerful2
- Nice2
- Just awesome2
- Used everywhere2
- Improves productivity1
- Javascript1
- Easy Setup1
- Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup1
- It Just Works1
- Industry acceptance1
- Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS1
- Widely Used1
- I love jQuery1
Pros of vue-next
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of jQuery
- Large size6
- Sometimes inconsistent API5
- Encourages DOM as primary data source5
- Live events is overly complex feature2