Jenkins vs Scrutinizer

Overview

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

Scrutinizer

Stacks94

Followers64

Votes20

Jenkins vs Scrutinizer: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Jenkins and Scrutinizer, it is essential to understand the key differences between these two popular tools for continuous integration and code quality analysis.

Integration with external tools: Jenkins has extensive support for integrating with various external tools and plugins, making it highly customizable and versatile. On the other hand, Scrutinizer provides built-in support for a wide range of tools, such as Git, GitHub, and Bitbucket, streamlining the setup process for users who rely on these tools for their development workflows.
Code analysis capabilities: Jenkins focuses primarily on automating the build, test, and deployment processes, with limited in-built code analysis capabilities. In contrast, Scrutinizer specializes in code quality analysis, providing detailed insights into code metrics, static code analysis, and code coverage reports, enabling developers to improve the overall quality of their codebase.
User interface and visualization: Jenkins offers a highly customizable user interface, allowing users to create and configure custom dashboards and views for monitoring their continuous integration pipelines. Meanwhile, Scrutinizer provides a more streamlined and visually appealing interface, with built-in charts and graphs that offer a quick overview of the code quality and performance metrics.
Pricing model: Jenkins is an open-source tool, which means it is free to use and can be self-hosted on any infrastructure. In contrast, Scrutinizer offers both open-source and commercial versions, with additional features and support available in the paid plans, making it a more suitable option for businesses with specific requirements and priorities.
Community support and documentation: Jenkins has a vast and active community of users and contributors, offering a wealth of resources, tutorials, and plugins to enhance the functionality of the tool. On the other hand, Scrutinizer has a smaller user base and community support, which may limit the availability of resources and assistance for users seeking help with configuration or troubleshooting.

Summary

In summary, Jenkins and Scrutinizer differ in their integration capabilities, code analysis features, user interface design, pricing models, and community support, catering to different preferences and requirements in the realm of continuous integration and code quality analysis.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Scrutinizer

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k

Comments

Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins	Scrutinizer
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.	Scrutinizer is a continuous inspection platform helping you to create better software.
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support	Continuously measure and track your code quality;Project quality broken down;Know your problem areas;Works fine with legacy code bases
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 9.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 59.2K	Stacks 94
Followers 50.4K	Followers 64
Votes 2.2K	Votes 20
Pros & Cons
Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines 7 Lack of support	Pros 7 Github integration / sync 4 Bitbucket integration / sync 2 Gitlab integration / sync 2 Private Git repo sync 1 Python inspection Cons 1 Pricing
Integrations
No integrations available	GitHub Bitbucket

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Scrutinizer?

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Related Comparisons

Jenkins vs Scrutinizer: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Jenkins and Scrutinizer, it is essential to understand the key differences between these two popular tools for continuous integration and code quality analysis.

Integration with external tools: Jenkins has extensive support for integrating with various external tools and plugins, making it highly customizable and versatile. On the other hand, Scrutinizer provides built-in support for a wide range of tools, such as Git, GitHub, and Bitbucket, streamlining the setup process for users who rely on these tools for their development workflows.
Code analysis capabilities: Jenkins focuses primarily on automating the build, test, and deployment processes, with limited in-built code analysis capabilities. In contrast, Scrutinizer specializes in code quality analysis, providing detailed insights into code metrics, static code analysis, and code coverage reports, enabling developers to improve the overall quality of their codebase.
User interface and visualization: Jenkins offers a highly customizable user interface, allowing users to create and configure custom dashboards and views for monitoring their continuous integration pipelines. Meanwhile, Scrutinizer provides a more streamlined and visually appealing interface, with built-in charts and graphs that offer a quick overview of the code quality and performance metrics.
Pricing model: Jenkins is an open-source tool, which means it is free to use and can be self-hosted on any infrastructure. In contrast, Scrutinizer offers both open-source and commercial versions, with additional features and support available in the paid plans, making it a more suitable option for businesses with specific requirements and priorities.
Community support and documentation: Jenkins has a vast and active community of users and contributors, offering a wealth of resources, tutorials, and plugins to enhance the functionality of the tool. On the other hand, Scrutinizer has a smaller user base and community support, which may limit the availability of resources and assistance for users seeking help with configuration or troubleshooting.

Jenkins vs Scrutinizer

Overview

Jenkins vs Scrutinizer: What are the differences?

Introduction