StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Jenkins vs Phabricator

Jenkins vs Phabricator

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Phabricator
Phabricator
Stacks221
Followers323
Votes187

Jenkins vs Phabricator: What are the differences?

### Introduction
When comparing Jenkins and Phabricator, it's essential to understand the key differences between these popular tools used in software development and continuous integration.

1. **Architecture**: Jenkins follows a master-slave architecture where the master node manages all tasks and delegates jobs to multiple slave nodes. In contrast, Phabricator uses a monolithic architecture where all components of the platform are tightly integrated into a single application, providing a consolidated solution for code review, repository hosting, and CI/CD.

2. **Scalability**: Jenkins may require additional effort to scale as the number of projects and users grow, especially with the need to manage multiple nodes in the master-slave setup. On the other hand, Phabricator offers built-in scalability features that make it more manageable to handle increasing workloads without significant configuration changes.

3. **Workflow Integration**: Phabricator excels in offering a seamless workflow integration by combining code review, repository management, and CI processes within a single platform, streamlining the development lifecycle. Jenkins, while powerful in CI/CD capabilities, may require additional plugins or extensions to achieve a similar level of integration for a comprehensive development environment.

4. **User Interface**: Jenkins provides a more utilitarian user interface focused on functionality with a plethora of plugins to customize and enhance the user experience. In contrast, Phabricator offers a more modern and user-friendly interface out-of-the-box, simplifying navigation and enhancing the overall user experience without the need for extensive customization.

5. **Security Features**: Phabricator emphasizes security with robust features such as audit trails, fine-grained access controls, and encryption mechanisms to protect sensitive data and code repositories. While Jenkins does offer security plugins and options, achieving a similar level of security may require additional third-party integrations or custom configurations.

6. **Maintenance and Support**: Jenkins, being an open-source tool with a vast community, relies heavily on community support for issue resolution and updates. In comparison, Phabricator provides dedicated support and maintenance services, ensuring timely updates, bug fixes, and professional assistance for organizations seeking reliable and continuous support for their development infrastructure.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Jenkins and Phabricator can help organizations make informed decisions when selecting a tool that aligns with their development needs and scalability requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Phabricator

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Phabricator
Phabricator

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
reviewing code before it hits master; auditing code after it hits master; hosting Git/Hg/SVN repositories; tracking bugs or "features"; counting down to HL3; expounding liberal tomes of text; nit picking pixels with designers; "project" "manage" "ment"; hiding stuff from coworkers; and also other random things, like memes, badges, and tokens.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
221
Followers
50.4K
Followers
323
Votes
2.2K
Votes
187
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
  • 7
    Lack of support
Pros
  • 33
    Open Source
  • 29
    Code Review
  • 25
    Supports Git/Hg/SVN
  • 18
    Bug Tracking
  • 17
    Audit Source Code
Integrations
No integrations available
Asana
Asana
Jira
Jira
CircleCI
CircleCI
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Phabricator?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana