Jenkins vs Mocha

Overview

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

Mocha

Stacks10.8K

Followers3.0K

Votes430

Jenkins vs Mocha: What are the differences?

Introduction: Jenkins and Mocha are both popular tools in the software development domain, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features that set them apart. Let's delve into the key differences between Jenkins and Mocha.

Type of Tool: Jenkins is a continuous integration and automation tool that is primarily used for building, testing, and deploying software. On the other hand, Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework that runs on Node.js and in the browser, making it a versatile tool for testing JavaScript applications.
Intended Use: Jenkins is more focused on automating the build and deployment process of applications, ensuring that code changes are integrated and tested seamlessly. In contrast, Mocha is designed specifically for testing code, allowing developers to write and execute test cases to ensure the functionality and reliability of their JavaScript code.
Language Support: Jenkins is language-agnostic and can be used with various programming languages and tools, making it suitable for a wide range of projects. Mocha, on the other hand, is tailored for JavaScript testing and provides robust support for testing Node.js applications and browser-based JavaScript code.
User Interface: Jenkins offers a web-based interface that allows users to configure and monitor their build jobs, providing a visual representation of the build pipelines and status. Mocha, on the other hand, is primarily used through the command line interface or integrated with development environments, offering a more developer-centric approach to testing.
Community and Ecosystem: Jenkins has a vast community and plugin ecosystem that enables users to extend and customize its functionality according to their needs, with numerous plugins available for various development tools and platforms. In comparison, Mocha has a strong community of developers and a rich ecosystem of libraries and tools specifically tailored for JavaScript testing.

In Summary, Jenkins is a versatile automation tool for building and deploying software, while Mocha is a powerful JavaScript testing framework with a focus on writing and executing test cases for JavaScript applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Mocha

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k

Comments

Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins	Mocha
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.	Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support	browser support;simple async support, including promises;test coverage reporting;string diff support;javascript API for running tests;proper exit status for CI support etc;auto-detects and disables coloring for non-ttys;maps uncaught exceptions to the correct test case;async test timeout support;test-specific timeouts;growl notification support;reports test durations;highlights slow tests;file watcher support;global variable leak detection
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 9.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 59.2K	Stacks 10.8K
Followers 50.4K	Followers 3.0K
Votes 2.2K	Votes 430
Pros & Cons
Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines 7 Lack of support	Pros 137 Open source 102 Simple 81 Promise support 48 Flexible 29 Easy to add support for Generators Cons 3 Cannot test a promisified functions without assertion 2 No assertion count in results 1 Not as many reporter options as Jest

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Mocha?

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

Jenkins vs Mocha: What are the differences?

Type of Tool: Jenkins is a continuous integration and automation tool that is primarily used for building, testing, and deploying software. On the other hand, Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework that runs on Node.js and in the browser, making it a versatile tool for testing JavaScript applications.
Intended Use: Jenkins is more focused on automating the build and deployment process of applications, ensuring that code changes are integrated and tested seamlessly. In contrast, Mocha is designed specifically for testing code, allowing developers to write and execute test cases to ensure the functionality and reliability of their JavaScript code.
Language Support: Jenkins is language-agnostic and can be used with various programming languages and tools, making it suitable for a wide range of projects. Mocha, on the other hand, is tailored for JavaScript testing and provides robust support for testing Node.js applications and browser-based JavaScript code.
User Interface: Jenkins offers a web-based interface that allows users to configure and monitor their build jobs, providing a visual representation of the build pipelines and status. Mocha, on the other hand, is primarily used through the command line interface or integrated with development environments, offering a more developer-centric approach to testing.
Community and Ecosystem: Jenkins has a vast community and plugin ecosystem that enables users to extend and customize its functionality according to their needs, with numerous plugins available for various development tools and platforms. In comparison, Mocha has a strong community of developers and a rich ecosystem of libraries and tools specifically tailored for JavaScript testing.

Jenkins vs Mocha

Overview