StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Apache Mesos vs Jenkins

Apache Mesos vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos
Stacks306
Followers418
Votes31
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks1.7K

Apache Mesos vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Apache Mesos and Jenkins are both popular tools in the DevOps landscape. However, they serve different purposes and have distinct features. Here, we highlight some key differences between Apache Mesos and Jenkins.

  1. Architecture: Apache Mesos is a distributed systems kernel that enables the sharing of resources in a datacenter. It abstracts CPU, memory, storage, and other computing resources, allowing multiple applications to easily share resources in a dynamic environment. On the other hand, Jenkins is a continuous integration and continuous delivery tool that helps automate the building, testing, and deployment of software applications.

  2. Use Case: Apache Mesos is particularly useful for managing and scaling large-scale clustered applications efficiently. It can handle complex workloads and ensure optimal resource utilization across multiple nodes. In contrast, Jenkins is more focused on automating the software development process, enabling teams to continuously integrate code changes, run tests, and deploy applications.

  3. Scalability: Apache Mesos is designed for scalability and can handle thousands of nodes in a cluster. It is well-suited for large-scale infrastructure environments where resources need to be efficiently utilized. Jenkins, while scalable to a certain extent, may face challenges when dealing with extremely large clusters and heavy workloads.

  4. Resource Management: Apache Mesos provides fine-grained resource isolation and sharing capabilities, allowing applications to run on a shared pool of resources without interfering with each other. Jenkins, on the other hand, primarily focuses on automating the software development lifecycle and does not offer the same level of resource management features as Apache Mesos.

  5. Fault Tolerance: Apache Mesos is built with fault tolerance in mind, ensuring that applications continue to run smoothly even in the event of node failures or network disruptions. Jenkins, while it can be configured for some level of fault tolerance, may not offer the same level of resiliency as Apache Mesos in complex distributed environments.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Apache Mesos has a thriving open-source community and a rich ecosystem of frameworks and tools that extend its functionality for various use cases. Jenkins also has a strong community support and a wide range of plugins available for extending its capabilities, but the depth and breadth of the ecosystem may differ from that of Apache Mesos.

In Summary, Apache Mesos focuses on resource management and scalability for large-scale clustered applications, whereas Jenkins is geared towards automating the software development lifecycle with continuous integration and delivery capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Apache Mesos

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that simplifies the complexity of running applications on a shared pool of servers.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Fault-tolerant replicated master using ZooKeeper;Scalability to 10,000s of nodes;Isolation between tasks with Linux Containers;Multi-resource scheduling (memory and CPU aware);Java, Python and C++ APIs for developing new parallel applications;Web UI for viewing cluster state
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
306
Followers
50.4K
Followers
418
Votes
2.2K
Votes
31
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
  • 7
    Lack of support
Pros
  • 21
    Easy scaling
  • 6
    Web UI
  • 2
    Fault-Tolerant
  • 1
    High-Available
  • 1
    Elastic Distributed System
Cons
  • 1
    Depends on Zookeeper
  • 1
    Not for long term
Integrations
No integrations available
Apache Aurora
Apache Aurora

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Apache Mesos?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana