Jekyll vs WordPress

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jekyll

1.9K
1.4K
+ 1
230
WordPress

96K
38.5K
+ 1
2.1K
Add tool

Jekyll vs WordPress: What are the differences?

Introduction

Jekyll and WordPress are two popular platforms used to build websites and blogs. While both can be used for similar purposes, they have some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Language and Structure: Jekyll is a static site generator that uses Markdown or HTML for content creation and Liquid for its templating language. It converts the source files into static HTML pages that can be deployed to a web server. WordPress, on the other hand, is a dynamic content management system (CMS) that uses PHP and a MySQL database. It allows users to create and manage content through a user-friendly interface.

  2. Hosting: Jekyll generates static HTML files, which can be hosted on any web server or even on platforms like GitHub Pages, Netlify, or Amazon S3. With WordPress, hosting is typically done on a dedicated server or a hosting provider that supports PHP and MySQL. This requires more server resources, configuration, and maintenance compared to hosting static files.

  3. Customization: Jekyll offers a high level of customization as it allows developers to create their own layouts, templates, and styles using HTML, CSS, and Liquid. It provides more control over the design and functionality of the website. WordPress, on the other hand, offers a wide range of themes and plugins that can be easily installed and customized through the admin interface. It requires less coding knowledge for customization but may have limitations compared to Jekyll.

  4. Security and Updates: Jekyll's static nature makes it inherently more secure compared to WordPress. Since there is no database or server-side scripting involved, there are fewer vulnerabilities and attack vectors. WordPress, being a dynamic CMS, may require regular updates and maintenance to ensure security. It can be more susceptible to hacking attempts if not properly secured or kept up to date.

  5. Ease of Use: WordPress is known for its user-friendly interface and ease of use. It provides a WYSIWYG editor, drag-and-drop functionality, and intuitive admin interface, making it accessible for non-technical users. Jekyll, on the other hand, requires more technical knowledge as it involves working with command-line tools, writing code, and understanding the file structure.

  6. Performance: Jekyll's static files load faster than dynamic pages generated by WordPress, as there is no need for database queries or server-side processing. This makes Jekyll a better choice for websites that prioritize speed and performance. However, WordPress can also be optimized for performance with caching plugins and other optimizations.

In Summary, Jekyll is a static site generator that requires more technical knowledge but offers greater customization and security, while WordPress is a dynamic CMS that is user-friendly and provides a wide range of themes and plugins.

Decisions about Jekyll and WordPress
Manuel Feller
Frontend Engineer at BI X · | 4 upvotes · 162.5K views

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

See more
Xander Groesbeek
Founder at Rate My Meeting · | 5 upvotes · 220.2K views

So many choices for CMSs these days. So then what do you choose if speed, security and customization are key? Headless for one. Consuming your own APIs for content is absolute key. It makes designing pages in the front-end a breeze. Leaving Ghost and Cockpit. If I then looked at the footprint and impact on server load, Cockpit definitely wins that battle.

See more

10 Years ago I have started to check more about the online sphere and I have decided to make a website. There were a few CMS available at that time like WordPress or Joomla that you can use to have your website. At that point, I have decided to use WordPress as it was the easiest and I am glad I have made a good decision. Now WordPress is the most used CMS. Later I have created also a site about WordPress: https://www.wpdoze.com

See more
Dale Ross
Independent Contractor at Self Employed · | 22 upvotes · 1.5M views

I've heard that I have the ability to write well, at times. When it flows, it flows. I decided to start blogging in 2013 on Blogger. I started a company and joined BizPark with the Microsoft Azure allotment. I created a WordPress blog and did a migration at some point. A lot happened in the time after that migration but I stopped coding and changed cities during tumultuous times that taught me many lessons concerning mental health and productivity. I eventually graduated from BizSpark and outgrew the credit allotment. That killed the WordPress blog.

I blogged about writing again on the existing Blogger blog but it didn't feel right. I looked at a few options where I wouldn't have to worry about hosting cost indefinitely and Jekyll stood out with GitHub Pages. The Importer was fairly straightforward for the existing blog posts.

Todo * Set up redirects for all posts on blogger. The URI format is different so a complete redirect wouldn't work. Although, there may be something in Jekyll that could manage the redirects. I did notice the old URLs were stored in the front matter. I'm working on a command-line Ruby gem for the current plan. * I did find some of the lost WordPress posts on archive.org that I downloaded with the waybackmachinedownloader. I think I might write an importer for that. * I still have a few Disqus comment threads to map

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Jekyll
Pros of WordPress
  • 74
    Github pages integration
  • 54
    Open source
  • 37
    It's slick, customisable and hackerish
  • 24
    Easy to deploy
  • 23
    Straightforward cms for the hacker mindset
  • 7
    Gitlab pages integration
  • 5
    Best for blogging
  • 2
    Low maintenance
  • 2
    Easy to integrate localization
  • 1
    Huge plugins ecosystem
  • 1
    Authoring freedom and simplicity
  • 415
    Customizable
  • 366
    Easy to manage
  • 354
    Plugins & themes
  • 258
    Non-tech colleagues can update website content
  • 247
    Really powerful
  • 145
    Rapid website development
  • 78
    Best documentation
  • 51
    Codex
  • 44
    Product feature set
  • 35
    Custom/internal social network
  • 18
    Open source
  • 8
    Great for all types of websites
  • 7
    Huge install and user base
  • 5
    Perfect example of user collaboration
  • 5
    Open Source Community
  • 5
    Most websites make use of it
  • 5
    It's simple and easy to use by any novice
  • 5
    Best
  • 5
    I like it like I like a kick in the groin
  • 4
    Community
  • 4
    API-based CMS
  • 3
    Easy To use
  • 2
    <a href="https://secure.wphackedhel">Easy Beginner</a>

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Jekyll
Cons of WordPress
  • 4
    Build time increases exponentially as site grows
  • 2
    Lack of developments lately
  • 1
    Og doesn't work with postings dynamically
  • 13
    Hard to keep up-to-date if you customize things
  • 13
    Plugins are of mixed quality
  • 10
    Not best backend UI
  • 2
    Complex Organization
  • 1
    Do not cover all the basics in the core
  • 1
    Great Security

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Jekyll?

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

What is WordPress?

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Jekyll?
What companies use WordPress?
See which teams inside your own company are using Jekyll or WordPress.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Jekyll?
What tools integrate with WordPress?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

GitHubPythonSlack+25
7
3155
What are some alternatives to Jekyll and WordPress?
Hugo
Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.
Hexo
Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.
Ghost
Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.
Sphinx
It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server.
Pelican
Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.
See all alternatives