Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jekyll vs Pandoc: What are the differences?
Introduction: In the realm of web development and content creation, Jekyll and Pandoc are two commonly used tools that serve different purposes. While Jekyll focuses on generating static websites from markdown files, Pandoc is a universal document converter that can transform various file formats.
Input Formats: Jekyll primarily works with Markdown files, whereas Pandoc can handle a wide range of input formats, including Markdown, HTML, LaTeX, and Docx. This flexibility makes Pandoc a versatile tool for converting different types of documents.
Output Styles: Jekyll is designed for generating static websites, so its output is HTML-based. On the other hand, Pandoc can produce output in multiple formats like HTML, PDF, Word document, and more, making it suitable for various publishing needs.
Customization and Theming: Jekyll offers extensive theming options and customization capabilities through its templating system, allowing users to create unique designs for their websites. Pandoc, while offering some customization options, is more focused on document conversion rather than website theming.
Plugins and Extensions: Jekyll has a robust plugin ecosystem that enables users to add additional functionality to their sites, such as SEO optimization, social media integration, and more. In contrast, Pandoc does not have a similar plugin system, as its main function is file conversion.
Collaborative Editing: Jekyll is well-suited for individual developers or small teams working on static websites, as it simplifies the process of content creation and deployment. Pandoc, with its document conversion capabilities, can be used by writers and researchers collaborating on documents that need to be shared in multiple formats.
Learning Curve: Jekyll, with its focus on static site generation, has a more straightforward learning curve compared to Pandoc, which offers a range of advanced features for document conversion. Users looking for a quick way to create static websites may find Jekyll easier to grasp, while those needing complex document transformations may benefit from Pandoc's capabilities.
In Summary, Jekyll excels in creating static websites from Markdown files with customizable themes, while Pandoc is a versatile document converter supporting various input and output formats.
As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML
or Markdown
(what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.
Pros of Jekyll
- Github pages integration74
- Open source54
- It's slick, customisable and hackerish37
- Easy to deploy24
- Straightforward cms for the hacker mindset23
- Gitlab pages integration7
- Best for blogging5
- Low maintenance2
- Easy to integrate localization2
- Huge plugins ecosystem1
- Authoring freedom and simplicity1
Pros of Pandoc
- Markdown2
- More popular and active on github1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Jekyll
- Build time increases exponentially as site grows4
- Lack of developments lately2
- Og doesn't work with postings dynamically1