Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

JBoss

328
249
+ 1
0
lighttpd

148
133
+ 1
27
Add tool

JBoss vs lighttpd: What are the differences?

Developers describe JBoss as "An open-source Java EE-based application server". An application platform for hosting your apps that provides an innovative modular, cloud-ready architecture, powerful management and automation, and world class developer productivity. On the other hand, lighttpd is detailed as "A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments". lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

JBoss and lighttpd belong to "Web Servers" category of the tech stack.

WhatsApp, Frame, and Fusionbox are some of the popular companies that use lighttpd, whereas JBoss is used by Kanteron Systems, Syonet, and Tarya P2P. lighttpd has a broader approval, being mentioned in 15 company stacks & 4 developers stacks; compared to JBoss, which is listed in 14 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of JBoss
Pros of lighttpd
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 7
      Lightweight
    • 6
      Easy setup
    • 2
      Simplicity
    • 2
      Full featured
    • 2
      Proxy
    • 2
      Virtal hosting
    • 2
      Open source
    • 1
      Available modules
    • 1
      Fast
    • 1
      Security
    • 1
      Ssl support

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    What is JBoss?

    An application platform for hosting your apps that provides an innovative modular, cloud-ready architecture, powerful management and automation, and world class developer productivity.

    What is lighttpd?

    lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention JBoss and lighttpd as a desired skillset
    What companies use JBoss?
    What companies use lighttpd?
    See which teams inside your own company are using JBoss or lighttpd.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with JBoss?
    What tools integrate with lighttpd?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to JBoss and lighttpd?
    Apache Tomcat
    Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.
    Wildfly
    It is a flexible, lightweight, managed application runtime that helps you build amazing applications. It supports the latest standards for web development.
    GlassFish
    An Application Server means, It can manage Java EE applications You should use GlassFish for Java EE enterprise applications. The need for a seperate Web server is mostly needed in a production environment.
    Websphere
    It is a highly scalable, secure and reliable Java EE runtime environment designed to host applications and microservices for any size organization. It supports the Java EE, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile standards-based programming models.
    Spring Boot
    Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.
    See all alternatives