Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

IBM Containers

34
48
+ 1
0
Rancher

944
1.5K
+ 1
644
Add tool

IBM Containers vs Rancher: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Scalability**: IBM Containers allow users to easily scale their applications up or down based on their needs. This flexibility is crucial for handling varying workloads efficiently.
2. **User Interface**: Rancher provides a more user-friendly interface for managing containers compared to IBM Containers. This can make it easier for users to navigate and utilize its features effectively.
3. **Integration**: IBM Containers are tightly integrated with other IBM services and tools, making it seamless for users who are already using IBM cloud services. On the other hand, Rancher offers more flexibility in terms of integrating with various third-party tools and services.
4. **Resource Management**: Rancher provides more advanced resource management capabilities, allowing users to allocate resources more effectively and optimize the performance of their containers.
5. **Community Support**: Rancher has a strong community support system with active users and contributors, providing a wealth of resources and solutions for troubleshooting and implementation compared to IBM Containers.
6. **Cost**: IBM Containers may be more cost-effective for users already using IBM cloud services due to bundled pricing options, while Rancher may be more budget-friendly for users who are looking for a standalone container management solution without additional services.

In Summary, the key differences between IBM Containers and Rancher lie in scalability, user interface, integration, resource management, community support, and cost considerations.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of IBM Containers
Pros of Rancher
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 103
      Easy to use
    • 79
      Open source and totally free
    • 63
      Multi-host docker-compose support
    • 58
      Load balancing and health check included
    • 58
      Simple
    • 44
      Rolling upgrades, green/blue upgrades feature
    • 42
      Dns and service discovery out-of-the-box
    • 37
      Only requires docker
    • 34
      Multitenant and permission management
    • 29
      Easy to use and feature rich
    • 11
      Cross cloud compatible
    • 11
      Does everything needed for a docker infrastructure
    • 8
      Simple and powerful
    • 8
      Next-gen platform
    • 7
      Very Docker-friendly
    • 6
      Support Kubernetes and Swarm
    • 6
      Application catalogs with stack templates (wizards)
    • 6
      Supports Apache Mesos, Docker Swarm, and Kubernetes
    • 6
      Rolling and blue/green upgrades deployments
    • 6
      High Availability service: keeps your app up 24/7
    • 5
      Easy to use service catalog
    • 4
      Very intuitive UI
    • 4
      IaaS-vendor independent, supports hybrid/multi-cloud
    • 4
      Awesome support
    • 3
      Scalable
    • 2
      Requires less infrastructure requirements

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of IBM Containers
    Cons of Rancher
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 10
        Hosting Rancher can be complicated

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is IBM Containers?

      Managed Kubernetes offering to deliver powerful tools, an intuitive user experience, and built-in security and isolation to enable rapid delivery of applications all while leveraging Services including Watson, Weather, IoT, etc.

      What is Rancher?

      Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use IBM Containers?
      What companies use Rancher?
      See which teams inside your own company are using IBM Containers or Rancher.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with IBM Containers?
      What tools integrate with Rancher?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      PythonDockerKubernetes+7
      3
      1102
      May 21 2020 at 12:02AM

      Rancher Labs

      KubernetesAmazon EC2Grafana+12
      5
      1495
      Apr 16 2020 at 5:34AM

      Rancher Labs

      KubernetesRancher+2
      2
      936
      What are some alternatives to IBM Containers and Rancher?
      Docker
      The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
      Amazon EC2 Container Service
      Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.
      Google Kubernetes Engine
      Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.
      Amazon EKS
      Amazon Elastic Container Service for Kubernetes (Amazon EKS) is a managed service that makes it easy for you to run Kubernetes on AWS without needing to install and operate your own Kubernetes clusters.
      AWS Fargate
      AWS Fargate is a technology for Amazon ECS and EKS* that allows you to run containers without having to manage servers or clusters. With AWS Fargate, you no longer have to provision, configure, and scale clusters of virtual machines to run containers.
      See all alternatives