Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Hug vs Trails: What are the differences?
Developers describe Hug as "New Python REST API and CLI micro-framework". Hug aims to make developing Python driven APIs as simple as possible, but no simpler. As a result, it drastically simplifies Python API development. On the other hand, Trails is detailed as "Modern Web Application Framework for Node.js". Trails is a modern, community-driven web application framework for node.js. It builds on the pedigree of Rails and Grails to accelerate development by adhering to a straightforward, convention-based, API-driven design philosophy.
Hug and Trails can be categorized as "Microframeworks (Backend)" tools.
"Simple" is the top reason why over 3 developers like Hug, while over 7 developers mention "Easy setup and usage" as the leading cause for choosing Trails.
Hug and Trails are both open source tools. It seems that Hug with 5.8K GitHub stars and 344 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Trails with 1.72K GitHub stars and 75 GitHub forks.
Pros of Hug
- Simple4
- Self documenting2
- REST2
- Fast2
- Elegant2
Pros of Trails
- Easy setup and usage8
- ES20157
- Extensible6
- Modular6
- Open-source6
- Fast5
- Lightweight5
- Scalable4
- All that you need, without what you don’t2
- ES6/ES71