StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtualization Platform
  5. Horizon vs VMware Fusion

Horizon vs VMware Fusion

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion
Stacks84
Followers70
Votes0
Horizon
Horizon
Stacks22
Followers56
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.8K
Forks348

Horizon vs VMware Fusion: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides an overview of the key differences between Horizon and VMware Fusion. Horizon and VMware Fusion are both virtualization software products developed by VMware. However, there are important distinctions between them that are outlined below.

  1. Deployment Purpose: Horizon is primarily designed for enterprise-level environments where virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) is implemented to provide centralized desktop management and delivery. On the other hand, VMware Fusion is targeted towards individual users or small businesses who need access to virtual machines (VMs) on their personal computers. Horizon focuses on scaling and managing large-scale VDI deployments, while VMware Fusion caters to personal and professional VM usage.

  2. Features: Horizon offers a wide range of features specifically tailored for VDI management, including centralized image management, application delivery, remote access, and virtual desktop pooling. It also incorporates advanced capabilities like virtual GPU acceleration and support for Linux desktops. In comparison, the feature set of VMware Fusion is more geared towards individual users, providing capabilities such as running multiple operating systems simultaneously, sharing files and folders between VMs and host machines, and seamless integration with Mac hardware.

  3. Scaling and Performance: Horizon is designed to handle large-scale VDI deployments, allowing organizations to scale from a few to thousands of virtual desktops. It includes features like load balancing and multi-tenancy, enabling efficient management of resources and user sessions. VMware Fusion, on the other hand, focuses on delivering high-performance VMs for personal use. It emphasizes the utilization of system resources to provide a smooth and seamless virtualization experience for individual users.

  4. Management Interface: Horizon offers a web-based management interface known as the Horizon Administrator, which provides centralized control and configuration options for the VDI environment. It enables administrators to manage virtual desktops, applications, and users from a single console. In contrast, VMware Fusion provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface directly on the host machine, allowing users to manage their VMs without the need for a separate management console.

  5. Licensing Model: Horizon is licensed based on concurrent user connections, following a per-user or per-concurrent connection model. This allows organizations to optimize their licensing costs depending on the number of active users at any given time. VMware Fusion, on the other hand, adopts a per-machine licensing model, where a single license can be used on a specific host machine for running multiple VMs.

  6. Target Platforms: Horizon supports a broader range of client devices with various operating systems, including Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, and Android. It enables users to access their virtual desktops and applications from different platforms, providing flexibility and cross-platform compatibility. In contrast, VMware Fusion is specifically designed for macOS and targets Mac users who want to run VMs on their Apple hardware.

In summary, Horizon is geared towards enterprise-level VDI deployments, providing advanced features, scalability, and centralized management, while VMware Fusion is tailored for individual users, offering personal VM usage capabilities and seamless integration with Mac hardware.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion
Horizon
Horizon

It gives Mac users the power to run Windows on Mac along with hundreds of other operating systems side by side with Mac applications, without rebooting. It is simple enough for home users and powerful enough for IT professionals, developers and businesses.

Horizon provides a complete backend that makes it dramatically simpler to build, deploy, manage, and scale engaging JavaScript web and mobile apps. Horizon is extensible, integrates with the Node.js stack, and allows building modern, arbitrarily complex applications.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
6.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
348
Stacks
84
Stacks
22
Followers
70
Followers
56
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
RethinkDB
RethinkDB
GraphQL
GraphQL
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to VMware Fusion, Horizon?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot