Heroku CI vs TeamCity

Overview

TeamCity

Stacks1.2K

Followers1.1K

Votes316

Heroku CI

Stacks90

Followers132

Votes5

Heroku CI vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Heroku CI and TeamCity, two popular continuous integration tools used in software development.

Deployment Platforms: Heroku CI is tightly integrated with the Heroku platform, making it convenient for deploying applications directly to Heroku. On the other hand, TeamCity is a standalone CI tool that supports deployment to various platforms, not limited to Heroku.
Scalability: Heroku CI is designed to scale automatically based on the workload, allowing for ease of use and minimal maintenance. In contrast, TeamCity requires manual configuration for scaling, which can be time-consuming and complex for large projects.
Pricing Model: Heroku CI follows a pay-per-use pricing model, where users are charged based on the resources consumed. TeamCity, on the other hand, offers a licensing model based on the number of build agents and build configurations, which may be more cost-effective for certain organizations.
Customization Options: TeamCity provides extensive customization options through plugins and integrations with other tools, allowing users to tailor the CI process to their specific needs. While Heroku CI offers a streamlined workflow, it may lack the level of customization available in TeamCity.
Community Support: TeamCity has a large and active community of users, which can be beneficial for troubleshooting issues and sharing best practices. Heroku CI, being a more niche tool, may have a smaller user base and community support in comparison.
Integration Capabilities: TeamCity offers integrations with a wide range of third-party tools and services, making it easier to incorporate into existing development workflows. Heroku CI, while efficient for Heroku deployments, may have limitations in terms of integrating with other platforms and services.

In Summary, Heroku CI and TeamCity differ in deployment platforms, scalability, pricing model, customization options, community support, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

TeamCity	Heroku CI
TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.	On every push to GitHub, Heroku CI runs your tests in a disposable Heroku app, so there’s never a wait time for a free CI worker. Tests run fast, on Performance dynos.
Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;	-
Statistics
Stacks 1.2K	Stacks 90
Followers 1.1K	Followers 132
Votes 316	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 61 Easy to configure 37 Reliable and high-quality 32 On premise 32 User friendly 32 Github integration Cons 3 High costs for more than three build agents 2 User-friendly 2 User friendly 2 Proprietary	Pros 3 No waiting in the queue 1 Best in class pipeline integration 1 Consolidated Heroku billing
Integrations
Slack	Heroku GitHub

What are some alternatives to TeamCity, Heroku CI?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Heroku CI vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Heroku CI and TeamCity, two popular continuous integration tools used in software development.

Deployment Platforms: Heroku CI is tightly integrated with the Heroku platform, making it convenient for deploying applications directly to Heroku. On the other hand, TeamCity is a standalone CI tool that supports deployment to various platforms, not limited to Heroku.
Scalability: Heroku CI is designed to scale automatically based on the workload, allowing for ease of use and minimal maintenance. In contrast, TeamCity requires manual configuration for scaling, which can be time-consuming and complex for large projects.
Pricing Model: Heroku CI follows a pay-per-use pricing model, where users are charged based on the resources consumed. TeamCity, on the other hand, offers a licensing model based on the number of build agents and build configurations, which may be more cost-effective for certain organizations.
Customization Options: TeamCity provides extensive customization options through plugins and integrations with other tools, allowing users to tailor the CI process to their specific needs. While Heroku CI offers a streamlined workflow, it may lack the level of customization available in TeamCity.
Community Support: TeamCity has a large and active community of users, which can be beneficial for troubleshooting issues and sharing best practices. Heroku CI, being a more niche tool, may have a smaller user base and community support in comparison.
Integration Capabilities: TeamCity offers integrations with a wide range of third-party tools and services, making it easier to incorporate into existing development workflows. Heroku CI, while efficient for Heroku deployments, may have limitations in terms of integrating with other platforms and services.

In Summary, Heroku CI and TeamCity differ in deployment platforms, scalability, pricing model, customization options, community support, and integration capabilities.