Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
HBase vs Presto: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will discuss the key differences between HBase and Presto, two popular technologies used in the field of big data processing and analytics.
Data Model: HBase is a distributed, column-oriented NoSQL database that is designed to handle large amounts of structured data. It follows a key-value data model, where data is organized based on a row key and can be accessed using primary key lookups. On the other hand, Presto is a distributed SQL query engine that supports querying data from various data sources. It uses a relational data model and supports SQL-like queries on structured data.
Query Language: HBase does not provide a built-in query language like SQL. Instead, it offers a Java-based API for accessing and manipulating data. This requires developers to write custom code for querying and processing data. In contrast, Presto supports a wide range of standard SQL queries, making it easier for users to interact with the data. It also supports advanced features like joins, aggregations, and window functions.
Scalability: HBase is designed to handle large amounts of data and can scale horizontally by adding more nodes to the cluster. It offers automatic sharding and replication mechanisms to ensure data availability and fault tolerance. On the other hand, Presto is designed to work on top of existing data storage systems, such as Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) or Apache Hive. It can leverage the scalability and fault tolerance features of these underlying systems.
Data Storage: HBase stores data in a distributed manner across different region servers. It uses a distributed file system like HDFS to store data blocks and provides fast random read and write access. Presto, on the other hand, does not store data itself. It operates on the data stored in other systems like HDFS or Hive. It leverages the data locality and distributed storage capabilities of these systems.
Data Format: HBase stores data in a binary format, which is optimized for efficient storage and retrieval. It does not support complex data types like arrays or nested structures out of the box. In contrast, Presto supports a wide range of data formats, including Avro, Parquet, JSON, and CSV. It can handle complex data structures and provides built-in functions and operators for manipulating them.
Query Performance: HBase provides low latency access to individual records, making it suitable for real-time applications that require fast data retrieval. However, it may not perform well for complex analytical queries or joins involving multiple tables. Presto, on the other hand, is optimized for complex analytical queries and can process large amounts of data quickly. It supports parallel query execution and can leverage the distributed computing capabilities of the underlying storage systems.
In summary, HBase is a distributed, column-oriented NoSQL database with a key-value data model, while Presto is a distributed SQL query engine that supports querying data from various sources using a relational data model. HBase provides low latency access to individual records but may not be suitable for complex analytical queries, whereas Presto is optimized for complex analytical queries and leverages the scalability and fault tolerance features of underlying storage systems.
To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.
Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.
We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.
Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.
Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.
#BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering
The platform deals with time series data from sensors aggregated against things( event data that originates at periodic intervals). We use Cassandra as our distributed database to store time series data. Aggregated data insights from Cassandra is delivered as web API for consumption from other applications. Presto as a distributed sql querying engine, can provide a faster execution time provided the queries are tuned for proper distribution across the cluster. Another objective that we had was to combine Cassandra table data with other business data from RDBMS or other big data systems where presto through its connector architecture would have opened up a whole lot of options for us.
Pros of HBase
- Performance9
- OLTP5
- Fast Point Queries1
Pros of Presto
- Works directly on files in s3 (no ETL)18
- Open-source13
- Join multiple databases12
- Scalable10
- Gets ready in minutes7
- MPP6