StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Data Grids
  5. Handsontable vs Kendo UI

Handsontable vs Kendo UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Handsontable
Handsontable
Stacks58
Followers77
Votes6
GitHub Stars21.6K
Forks3.2K
Kendo UI
Kendo UI
Stacks297
Followers359
Votes33
GitHub Stars2.6K
Forks1.9K

Handsontable vs Kendo UI: What are the differences?

### Key Differences: Handsontable vs. Kendo UI

<Handsontable and Kendo UI are popular JavaScript libraries for creating interactive web applications. Below are the key differences between the two:>

1. **Data Binding**: Handsontable provides a flexible, easy-to-use data binding mechanism that allows developers to easily display, edit, and manipulate data. On the other hand, Kendo UI offers a powerful data binding system that supports a wide range of data sources and allows for seamless synchronization between the UI and the underlying data.
   
2. **Performance**: Handsontable is known for its speed and performance when dealing with large datasets. It efficiently handles thousands of rows and columns without lagging. Kendo UI, on the other hand, may experience performance issues when dealing with extensive data sets due to its more complex architecture and feature-rich components.

3. **Customization**: Handsontable offers a high level of customization options, allowing developers to tailor the appearance and behavior of the grid to meet their specific needs. Kendo UI also provides extensive customization capabilities, including themes, templates, and styling options, but it may require more effort to achieve advanced customizations compared to Handsontable.

4. **Complexity**: Handsontable is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it an ideal choice for developers looking for a straightforward grid solution. In contrast, Kendo UI is a more comprehensive framework with a steeper learning curve due to its wide range of features and components, making it better suited for complex web applications that require advanced functionalities.

5. **Support and Documentation**: Handsontable offers excellent documentation and community support, making it easy for developers to get started and troubleshoot issues. Kendo UI also provides comprehensive documentation and professional support, including forums, tutorials, and dedicated support staff, making it a reliable choice for enterprise-level applications with demanding requirements.

6. **Integration with Other Libraries**: Handsontable seamlessly integrates with various JavaScript libraries and frameworks, such as Angular, React, and Vue.js, providing a cohesive development experience. Kendo UI, although compatible with these libraries, may require extra setup and configuration to achieve the same level of integration and interoperability.

In Summary, Handsontable excels in data binding, performance, and simplicity, while Kendo UI offers robust customization, complexity for advanced applications, strong support, and integration capabilities with other libraries.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Handsontable
Handsontable
Kendo UI
Kendo UI

Handsontable is a minimalist approach to Excel-like table editor (datagrid/data grid) in HTML & JavaScript.

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Cell renderers;Custom HTML;Scroll bars & Column stretch;└ Scroll window;Conditional formatting;Pre-populate new rows;Highlight current row/col;Column sorting;Column & row resize;Column & row move;Fixed rows/columns;Pagination;Merge cells;Horizontal & vertical align;Custom borders;Column & row grouping
Ultimate Performance with Minimum Resources;Mobile-Friendly and Responsive;Built-In, Customizable Themes ;Open Source Core
Statistics
GitHub Stars
21.6K
GitHub Stars
2.6K
GitHub Forks
3.2K
GitHub Forks
1.9K
Stacks
58
Stacks
297
Followers
77
Followers
359
Votes
6
Votes
33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Excel in browser
  • 1
    Open Source Edition
Pros
  • 15
    Collection of controls
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Mobile
  • 4
    Multi-framework support
  • 2
    Built-in router
Cons
  • 4
    Massive footprint
  • 3
    Slow
  • 1
    Poor customizability
  • 1
    Expensive
  • 1
    Spotty Documentation
Integrations
No integrations available
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Handsontable, Kendo UI?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase