StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Hadoop vs RabbitMQ

Hadoop vs RabbitMQ

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hadoop
Hadoop
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.3K
Votes56
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks9.1K
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Stacks21.8K
Followers18.9K
Votes558
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks4.0K

Hadoop vs RabbitMQ: What are the differences?

Key differences between Hadoop and RabbitMQ

Hadoop and RabbitMQ are both widely used technologies in the field of data processing and messaging systems. However, they differ significantly in their purpose and functionality. Below are the key differences between Hadoop and RabbitMQ:

  1. Storage vs Messaging: Hadoop is primarily a distributed storage and processing framework, designed to handle large volumes of data across multiple machines. It provides a scalable and fault-tolerant storage solution for big data. On the other hand, RabbitMQ is a messaging broker that enables communication and coordination between distributed applications. It focuses on reliable message delivery and exchange patterns.

  2. Data Processing vs Message Queueing: Hadoop is designed for processing and analyzing large data sets using distributed computing techniques. It provides a framework for running parallelized MapReduce jobs to extract insights from data. In contrast, RabbitMQ facilitates the exchange of messages between applications through a predefined communication protocol. It handles the delivery and routing of messages efficiently.

  3. Batch Processing vs Real-time Messaging: Hadoop is well-suited for batch processing of data, where large datasets are processed in parallel over a longer period of time. It is optimized for tasks that require high throughput and can tolerate higher latency. On the other hand, RabbitMQ is optimized for real-time messaging scenarios, where messages need to be delivered and processed as soon as possible. It provides low-latency message delivery and supports pub/sub and point-to-point communication patterns.

  4. Complexity vs Simplicity: Hadoop is a complex framework with a steep learning curve, requiring specialized knowledge and expertise to set up, configure, and manage. It involves dealing with various components such as HDFS, YARN, and MapReduce. In contrast, RabbitMQ is relatively simple to use, with a lightweight architecture and intuitive API. It can be easily integrated into existing applications and requires minimal configuration and maintenance.

  5. Data Storage vs Message Durability: Hadoop stores data persistently and provides fault-tolerance by replicating data across multiple nodes. It ensures data durability even in the event of node failures. RabbitMQ, on the other hand, focuses on message durability by storing messages in memory or on disk until they are successfully delivered to consumers. It ensures that messages are not lost even in case of network or application failures.

  6. Data Processing Paradigm vs Messaging Patterns: Hadoop follows the MapReduce paradigm, where data is processed in parallel using map and reduce functions. It is optimized for batch processing tasks and requires data to be divided into chunks for distributed processing. RabbitMQ supports various messaging patterns such as message queues, publish/subscribe, and request/reply. It provides flexible and efficient message routing mechanisms for different communication scenarios.

In summary, Hadoop is a distributed storage and processing framework for big data analysis, whereas RabbitMQ is a messaging broker for reliable communication between distributed applications. Hadoop focuses on batch processing and complex data processing tasks, while RabbitMQ specializes in real-time messaging, simplicity, and efficient message delivery.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Hadoop, RabbitMQ

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
Pulkit
Pulkit

Software Engineer

Oct 30, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoAmazon SQSAmazon SQSRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Hi! I am creating a scraping system in Django, which involves long running tasks between 1 minute & 1 Day. As I am new to Message Brokers and Task Queues, I need advice on which architecture to use for my system. ( Amazon SQS, RabbitMQ, or Celery). The system should be autoscalable using Kubernetes(K8) based on the number of pending tasks in the queue.

474k views474k
Comments
Meili
Meili

Software engineer at Digital Science

Sep 24, 2020

Needs adviceonZeroMQZeroMQRabbitMQRabbitMQAmazon SQSAmazon SQS

Hi, we are in a ZMQ set up in a push/pull pattern, and we currently start to have more traffic and cases that the service is unavailable or stuck. We want to:

  • Not loose messages in services outages
  • Safely restart service without losing messages (@{ZeroMQ}|tool:1064| seems to need to close the socket in the receiver before restart manually)

Do you have experience with this setup with ZeroMQ? Would you suggest RabbitMQ or Amazon SQS (we are in AWS setup) instead? Something else?

Thank you for your time

500k views500k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Hadoop
Hadoop
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ

The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

-
Robust messaging for applications;Easy to use;Runs on all major operating systems;Supports a huge number of developer platforms;Open source and commercially supported
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Forks
9.1K
GitHub Forks
4.0K
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
21.8K
Followers
2.3K
Followers
18.9K
Votes
56
Votes
558
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 39
    Great ecosystem
  • 11
    One stack to rule them all
  • 4
    Great load balancer
  • 1
    Amazon aws
  • 1
    Java syntax
Pros
  • 235
    It's fast and it works with good metrics/monitoring
  • 80
    Ease of configuration
  • 60
    I like the admin interface
  • 52
    Easy to set-up and start with
  • 22
    Durable
Cons
  • 9
    Too complicated cluster/HA config and management
  • 6
    Needs Erlang runtime. Need ops good with Erlang runtime
  • 5
    Configuration must be done first, not by your code
  • 4
    Slow

What are some alternatives to Hadoop, RabbitMQ?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase