StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. Gun vs Pulsar

Gun vs Pulsar

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gun
Gun
Stacks49
Followers87
Votes0
GitHub Stars18.7K
Forks1.2K
Apache Pulsar
Apache Pulsar
Stacks119
Followers199
Votes24

Gun vs Pulsar: What are the differences?

Developers describe Gun as "Self-hosted Firebase". GUN is a realtime, decentralized, embedded, graph database engine. On the other hand, Pulsar is detailed as "Distributed solution providing messaging and queuing for streaming data". Apache Pulsar is a distributed messaging solution developed and released to open source at Yahoo. Pulsar supports both pub-sub messaging and queuing in a platform designed for performance, scalability, and ease of development and operation.

Gun and Pulsar can be categorized as "Realtime Backend / API" tools.

Gun and Pulsar are both open source tools. Gun with 10.3K GitHub stars and 640 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Pulsar with 3.77K GitHub stars and 862 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gun
Gun
Apache Pulsar
Apache Pulsar

GUN is a realtime, decentralized, embedded, graph database engine.

Apache Pulsar is a distributed messaging solution developed and released to open source at Yahoo. Pulsar supports both pub-sub messaging and queuing in a platform designed for performance, scalability, and ease of development and operation.

-
Unified model supporting pub-sub messaging and queuing; Easy scalability to millions of topics; Native multi-datacenter replication; Multi-language client API; Guaranteed data durability; Scalable distributed storage leveraging Apache BookKeeper
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
49
Stacks
119
Followers
87
Followers
199
Votes
0
Votes
24
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 0
    Small size
  • 0
    Real time
  • 0
    Open source
Pros
  • 7
    Simple
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 3
    High-throughput
  • 2
    Multi-tenancy
  • 2
    Geo-replication
Cons
  • 1
    Not jms compliant
  • 1
    No guaranteed dliefvery
  • 1
    No one and only one delivery
  • 1
    LImited Language support(6)
  • 1
    Very few commercial vendors for support

What are some alternatives to Gun, Apache Pulsar?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase