Gumby vs Toolkit: What are the differences?

1. Responsive Design: Gumby is built with responsive design in mind, allowing developers to easily create websites that adapt to different screen sizes and devices. Toolkit, on the other hand, focuses more on providing a comprehensive set of tools for web development without a specific emphasis on responsiveness.

2. Grid System: Gumby utilizes a flexible grid system that can be easily customized and adapted to different layouts, making it ideal for complex design requirements. Toolkit offers a simpler grid system that may not be as customizable but is more straightforward for developers looking for a quick and easy solution.

3. Typography Options: Gumby offers a wide range of typography options, including pre-designed styles and custom font choices, making it easier for developers to create visually appealing designs. Toolkit, while also providing typography features, may not offer as many options or as much flexibility in this area.

4. Community Support: Gumby has a dedicated community of users and developers who actively contribute to its development and provide support through forums and resources. Toolkit, while also having a user base, may not have as large or engaged of a community, potentially leading to fewer resources and support available.

5. JavaScript Components: Gumby includes a variety of pre-built JavaScript components, such as sliders, modals, and tabs, that can be easily integrated into websites for added functionality. Toolkit may offer some JavaScript components but may not have as extensive of a library as Gumby.

6. Browser Compatibility: Gumby is designed to be compatible with a wide range of browsers, ensuring that websites built with it will function consistently across different platforms. Toolkit may have some limitations in terms of browser compatibility, potentially requiring more customization to ensure optimal performance across various browsers.

In Summary, Gumby and Toolkit differ in their approach to responsive design, grid systems, typography options, community support, JavaScript components, and browser compatibility, each offering unique strengths and weaknesses for web development projects.