StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. GraphQL vs Zend Framework

GraphQL vs Zend Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zend Framework
Zend Framework
Stacks262
Followers215
Votes48
GraphQL
GraphQL
Stacks34.9K
Followers28.1K
Votes309

GraphQL vs Zend Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing GraphQL and Zend Framework, it's essential to understand the key differences between these two technologies.

  1. Data Querying and Retrieval: One major difference between GraphQL and Zend Framework is how data is queried and retrieved. With GraphQL, clients can request only the specific data they need, reducing over-fetching and under-fetching of data. In contrast, Zend Framework follows a more traditional RESTful approach where predefined endpoints determine the structure and content of the data returned, potentially leading to inefficiencies in data retrieval.

  2. Flexibility and Overhead: GraphQL offers a high degree of flexibility by allowing clients to define the shape and structure of the data they receive in a single query. On the other hand, Zend Framework, being a full-stack PHP framework, comes with more built-in functionalities and abstractions, potentially introducing additional overhead in certain cases where simpler solutions are needed.

  3. Schema Definition: In GraphQL, a clear and typed schema is defined for the API, enabling clients to understand the capabilities and structure of the data available. In contrast, Zend Framework relies on more traditional routing mechanisms, controllers, and models for handling requests, which might not provide the same level of schema clarity and introspection GraphQL offers.

  4. Real-time Data Updates: GraphQL has built-in support for real-time data updates through subscriptions, allowing clients to receive data changes in real-time without repeatedly polling the server. Zend Framework, however, typically requires additional implementation or integration with technologies like WebSockets to achieve real-time data updates, which can introduce complexity and performance considerations.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: GraphQL has seen rapid adoption and has a vibrant community of developers contributing tools, frameworks, and best practices. Zend Framework, while well-established in the PHP ecosystem, might have a smaller or more specialized community, potentially impacting the availability of resources, documentation, and community support for developers working with the framework.

In Summary, the differences between GraphQL and Zend Framework lie in their approach to data querying, flexibility, schema definition, real-time data updates, and the size and dynamics of their respective communities, influencing their suitability for different development scenarios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Zend Framework
Zend Framework
GraphQL
GraphQL

It is an open source framework for developing web applications and services using PHP 5.3+. It uses 100% object-oriented code and utilizes most of the new features of namely namespaces, late static binding, lambda functions and closures.

GraphQL is a data query language and runtime designed and used at Facebook to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps since 2012.

Pure object oriented web application framework; Advanced MVC implementation; Supports multi databases including PostgreSQL, SQLite etc; Simple cloud API; Session management; Data encryption; Flexible URI Routing; Zend provides RESTful API development support.
Hierarchical;Product-centric;Client-specified queries;Backwards Compatible;Structured, Arbitrary Code;Application-Layer Protocol;Strongly-typed;Introspective
Statistics
Stacks
262
Stacks
34.9K
Followers
215
Followers
28.1K
Votes
48
Votes
309
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 25
    Open source
  • 11
    Community
  • 4
    Fast
  • 3
    Scalable
  • 2
    Many library
Pros
  • 75
    Schemas defined by the requests made by the user
  • 63
    Will replace RESTful interfaces
  • 62
    The future of API's
  • 49
    The future of databases
  • 12
    Get many resources in a single request
Cons
  • 4
    Hard to migrate from GraphQL to another technology
  • 4
    More code to type.
  • 2
    Takes longer to build compared to schemaless.
  • 1
    Works just like any other API at runtime
  • 1
    All the pros sound like NFT pitches
Integrations
Expressive
Expressive
PHP
PHP
GitHub
GitHub
Webex
Webex
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Zend Framework, GraphQL?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase