StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. GraphQL vs hapi

GraphQL vs hapi

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

hapi
hapi
Stacks434
Followers456
Votes87
GraphQL
GraphQL
Stacks34.9K
Followers28.1K
Votes309

GraphQL vs hapi: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will be discussing the key differences between GraphQL and hapi.

  1. Implementation: GraphQL is a query language for APIs and a runtime for executing queries with existing data while hapi is a free and open-source web application framework for building scalable web applications, APIs, and services in Node.js. GraphQL focuses on data querying while hapi provides a complete framework for building web applications.

  2. Data Fetching: GraphQL allows clients to request specific data by making a single request to the server, reducing the data over-fetching and under-fetching issues. On the other hand, hapi follows a traditional RESTful API approach where clients need to make multiple requests to different endpoints to fetch the required data.

  3. Schema Definition: GraphQL requires defining a schema that represents the data structure and how it can be queried by clients. This schema acts as a contract between the client and server. In hapi, the data structure and endpoints can be defined using the framework's routing configuration, without the need for a specific schema definition.

  4. Type System: GraphQL has its own type system, which provides strong typing and allows defining custom types and relationships between them. This enables better validation and documentation of the API. Hapi, on the other hand, does not have a built-in type system and allows developers to define their own validation rules and data structures.

  5. Performance: GraphQL optimizes performance by allowing clients to request only the required data and avoids over-fetching or under-fetching. Hapi, being a more traditional framework, might face performance issues if not carefully designed to handle data fetching efficiently.

  6. Flexibility: GraphQL provides a high level of flexibility as clients can request exactly what they need, allowing the server to evolve and change without impacting the clients. Hapi, as a web application framework, provides flexibility in terms of building different types of applications but may need modifications in the server and client endpoints when making changes to the data structure or API.

In summary, GraphQL focuses on data querying, provides a strong type system, optimizes performance, and offers flexibility in data fetching, while hapi is a complete web application framework providing flexibility in application building and data handling but follows a more traditional RESTful API approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on hapi, GraphQL

Raj
Raj

Oct 10, 2020

Review

It purely depends on your app needs. Does it need to be scalable, do you have lots of features, OR it is a simple project with very simple needs - many of those parameters clarify which technologies will fit.

If you are looking for a quick solution, that reduces lot of development time, take a look at postgraphile (https://www.graphile.org/postgraphile/). You have to just define the schema and you get the entire graph-ql apis built for you and you can just focus on your frontend.

On frontend, React is good, but also need to remember that it is popular because it introduced one way data writes and in-built virtual dom + diffing to determine which dom to modify. Though personally I liked it, am recently more inclined to Svelte because its lightweightedness and absence of virtual dom and its simplicity compared to the huge ecosystem that React has surrounded itself with.

In all situations, frameworks keep changing over time. What is best today is not considered even good few years from now. What is important is to have the logic in a separate, clean manner void of too many framework related dependencies - that way you can switch one framework with another very easily.

3.77k views3.77k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

hapi
hapi
GraphQL
GraphQL

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

GraphQL is a data query language and runtime designed and used at Facebook to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps since 2012.

-
Hierarchical;Product-centric;Client-specified queries;Backwards Compatible;Structured, Arbitrary Code;Application-Layer Protocol;Strongly-typed;Introspective
Statistics
Stacks
434
Stacks
34.9K
Followers
456
Followers
28.1K
Votes
87
Votes
309
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 27
    Makes me Hapi making REST APIs
  • 14
    Configuration
  • 14
    Simpler than other REST libraries
  • 13
    Quality Driven Ecosystem
  • 13
    Modularization
Pros
  • 75
    Schemas defined by the requests made by the user
  • 63
    Will replace RESTful interfaces
  • 62
    The future of API's
  • 49
    The future of databases
  • 12
    Get many resources in a single request
Cons
  • 4
    Hard to migrate from GraphQL to another technology
  • 4
    More code to type.
  • 2
    Takes longer to build compared to schemaless.
  • 1
    All the pros sound like NFT pitches
  • 1
    Works just like any other API at runtime
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to hapi, GraphQL?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase