Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GraphQL vs hapi: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this Markdown code, we will be discussing the key differences between GraphQL and hapi.
Implementation: GraphQL is a query language for APIs and a runtime for executing queries with existing data while hapi is a free and open-source web application framework for building scalable web applications, APIs, and services in Node.js. GraphQL focuses on data querying while hapi provides a complete framework for building web applications.
Data Fetching: GraphQL allows clients to request specific data by making a single request to the server, reducing the data over-fetching and under-fetching issues. On the other hand, hapi follows a traditional RESTful API approach where clients need to make multiple requests to different endpoints to fetch the required data.
Schema Definition: GraphQL requires defining a schema that represents the data structure and how it can be queried by clients. This schema acts as a contract between the client and server. In hapi, the data structure and endpoints can be defined using the framework's routing configuration, without the need for a specific schema definition.
Type System: GraphQL has its own type system, which provides strong typing and allows defining custom types and relationships between them. This enables better validation and documentation of the API. Hapi, on the other hand, does not have a built-in type system and allows developers to define their own validation rules and data structures.
Performance: GraphQL optimizes performance by allowing clients to request only the required data and avoids over-fetching or under-fetching. Hapi, being a more traditional framework, might face performance issues if not carefully designed to handle data fetching efficiently.
Flexibility: GraphQL provides a high level of flexibility as clients can request exactly what they need, allowing the server to evolve and change without impacting the clients. Hapi, as a web application framework, provides flexibility in terms of building different types of applications but may need modifications in the server and client endpoints when making changes to the data structure or API.
In summary, GraphQL focuses on data querying, provides a strong type system, optimizes performance, and offers flexibility in data fetching, while hapi is a complete web application framework providing flexibility in application building and data handling but follows a more traditional RESTful API approach.
Pros of GraphQL
- Schemas defined by the requests made by the user75
- Will replace RESTful interfaces63
- The future of API's62
- The future of databases49
- Self-documenting13
- Get many resources in a single request12
- Query Language6
- Ask for what you need, get exactly that6
- Fetch different resources in one request3
- Type system3
- Evolve your API without versions3
- Ease of client creation2
- GraphiQL2
- Easy setup2
- "Open" document1
- Fast prototyping1
- Supports subscription1
- Standard1
- Good for apps that query at build time. (SSR/Gatsby)1
- 1. Describe your data1
- Better versioning1
- Backed by Facebook1
- Easy to learn1
Pros of hapi
- Makes me Hapi making REST APIs27
- Simpler than other REST libraries14
- Configuration14
- Quality Driven Ecosystem13
- Modularization13
- Easy testability5
- Better validation1
- Restify0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GraphQL
- Hard to migrate from GraphQL to another technology4
- More code to type.4
- Takes longer to build compared to schemaless.2
- No support for caching1
- All the pros sound like NFT pitches1
- No support for streaming1
- Works just like any other API at runtime1
- N+1 fetch problem1
- No built in security1