StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Gradle vs SCons

Gradle vs SCons

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gradle
Gradle
Stacks24.3K
Followers9.8K
Votes254
GitHub Stars18.1K
Forks5.0K
SCons
SCons
Stacks8
Followers17
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.3K
Forks338

Gradle vs SCons: What are the differences?

  1. Build Language: The key difference between Gradle and SCons is the build language they use. Gradle utilizes a Groovy-based domain-specific language for its build scripts, offering a high level of flexibility and extensibility. On the other hand, SCons relies on Python as its build language, providing a powerful and expressive scripting interface for defining builds.

  2. Configuration Management: In terms of configuration management, Gradle offers a declarative approach where developers specify the desired state of the build, allowing Gradle to handle the details of how to achieve that state. In contrast, SCons follows an imperative approach that requires developers to explicitly specify each step of the build process, giving more fine-grained control but potentially leading to more verbose build scripts.

  3. Community Support: Gradle has a large and active community, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, plugins, and support forums for users. This robust community ecosystem makes it easier for developers to find resources and solutions to common issues. SCons, although having a dedicated user base, may not have as extensive a support network as Gradle.

  4. Task Dependency Resolution: Gradle uses a sophisticated dependency management system that automatically resolves and downloads dependencies required for a build, simplifying the build process. In contrast, SCons requires users to manually specify dependencies, which can be more labor-intensive and prone to errors if not managed carefully.

  5. Integration with IDEs: Gradle offers seamless integration with popular IDEs such as IntelliJ IDEA and Eclipse, providing features like auto-import of project structure and build script editing support within the IDE. While SCons can be used with various IDEs, the level of integration and support may vary, potentially requiring additional setup and configuration.

  6. Performance: Gradle is known for its efficiency in handling large-scale builds, thanks to its incremental build capabilities that only rebuild necessary parts of the project. SCons, while capable of handling complex build scenarios, may not be as optimized for speed and scalability as Gradle in certain situations.

In Summary, Gradle and SCons differ in their build language, configuration management approaches, community support, task dependency resolution, IDE integration, and performance characteristics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gradle
Gradle
SCons
SCons

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

It is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool. Think of it as an improved, cross-platform substitute for the classic Make utility with integrated functionality similar to autoconf/automake and compiler caches such as ccache. In short, it is an easier, more reliable and faster way to build software.

Declarative builds and build-by-convention;Language for dependency based programming;Structure your build;Deep API;Gradle scales;Multi-project builds;Many ways to manage your dependencies;Gradle is the first build integration tool
Reliable, automatic dependency analysis built-in for C, C++ and Fortran; Use the power of a real programming language to solve build problems; Built-in support for fetching source files from SCCS, RCS, CVS, BitKeeper and Perforce; Reliable detection of build changes using MD5 signatures
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.1K
GitHub Stars
2.3K
GitHub Forks
5.0K
GitHub Forks
338
Stacks
24.3K
Stacks
8
Followers
9.8K
Followers
17
Votes
254
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 110
    Flexibility
  • 51
    Easy to use
  • 47
    Groovy dsl
  • 22
    Slow build time
  • 10
    Crazy memory leaks
Cons
  • 8
    Inactionnable documentation
  • 6
    It is just the mess of Ant++
  • 4
    Hard to decide: ten or more ways to achieve one goal
  • 2
    Dependency on groovy
  • 2
    Bad Eclipse tooling
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
C++
C++
Qt
Qt
Perforce
Perforce
BitKeeper
BitKeeper

What are some alternatives to Gradle, SCons?

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Apache Ant

Apache Ant

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

Please

Please

Please is a cross-language build system with an emphasis on high performance, extensibility and reproduceability. It supports a number of popular languages and can automate nearly any aspect of your build process.

CMake

CMake

It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.

Sonatype Nexus

Sonatype Nexus

It is an open source repository that supports many artifact formats, including Docker, Java™ and npm. With the Nexus tool integration, pipelines in your toolchain can publish and retrieve versioned apps and their dependencies

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana