Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Gradle vs SBT: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Gradle and SBT, highlighting the key differences between the two build automation tools.
1. Language and Ecosystem Compatibility: Gradle is written in Java and supports projects based on languages like Java, Kotlin, and Groovy. On the other hand, SBT is designed for Scala projects. While Gradle can work with Scala projects, SBT provides better support and integration with Scala-specific features and libraries.
2. Build Configuration and DSL: Gradle uses a Groovy-based DSL (Domain-Specific Language) for build configuration, which provides flexibility and expressiveness. SBT, on the other hand, uses a Scala-based DSL that leverages the powerful features of the Scala language for build configuration. This difference in DSLs makes the build configuration code differ in syntax and structure between Gradle and SBT.
3. Dependency Management: Gradle uses a flexible and powerful dependency management system, allowing developers to easily manage dependencies from various sources like repositories and local files. SBT also offers robust dependency management, but it leverages the Ivy dependency management system, which is known for its high performance and compatibility with Maven repositories.
4. Performance and Scalability: Gradle is known for its excellent performance and scalability, especially for large-scale projects. Its build caching, incremental builds, and parallel execution capabilities contribute to faster build times. While SBT also performs well, it may struggle with larger projects due to its reliance on the JVM and Scala's inherent complexity.
5. Community and Plugin Ecosystem: Gradle has a large and active community, enabling developers to find support and resources easily. It has a vast plugin ecosystem, allowing developers to leverage a wide range of plugins for various tasks. SBT, although not as widely used as Gradle, also has an active community and a growing number of plugins specifically tailored for Scala projects.
6. Tooling Integration and IDE Support: Gradle's extensive tooling support and IDE integration are often considered its strong points. It seamlessly integrates with popular IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA and Eclipse, providing features like code completion, build status, and more. SBT, being designed for Scala projects, also has good IDE support, primarily through plugins for IntelliJ IDEA and Scala IDE.
In summary, the key differences between Gradle and SBT lie in their language and ecosystem compatibility, build configuration and DSL, dependency management approach, performance and scalability, community and plugin ecosystem, and tooling integration and IDE support.
Pros of Gradle
- Flexibility110
- Easy to use51
- Groovy dsl47
- Slow build time22
- Crazy memory leaks10
- Fast incremental builds8
- Kotlin DSL5
- Windows Support1
Pros of SBT
- Support for publishing artifacts in Maven, Ivy formats1
- Works across Windows, Linux and MacOS1
- Support for Zinc and BSP1
- No Breaking Changes1
- Best for Mono-Repo and Multi-Project builds1
- Preference option to build Mix Scala-Java Projects1
- IntelliJ support1
- Continuous compilation1
- Flexible1
- Dependency manageemnt1
- Incremental Builds1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Gradle
- Inactionnable documentation8
- It is just the mess of Ant++6
- Hard to decide: ten or more ways to achieve one goal4
- Bad Eclipse tooling2
- Dependency on groovy2
Cons of SBT
- Learning Curve is a bit steep1