StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. GlassFish vs Payara

GlassFish vs Payara

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GlassFish
GlassFish
Stacks581
Followers112
Votes0
Payara
Payara
Stacks41
Followers73
Votes0
GitHub Stars903
Forks312

GlassFish vs Payara: What are the differences?

Introduction:

GlassFish and Payara are two popular Java application servers that are used to deploy and run Java EE (Enterprise Edition) applications. While both have similar functionalities, there are key differences between them that can help you decide which one is best suited for your specific needs.

  1. Development and Community Support: One major difference between GlassFish and Payara is the level of development and community support. GlassFish is an open-source project that is mainly driven by Oracle, with contributions from the community. On the other hand, Payara is a community-driven fork of GlassFish that receives more frequent updates and releases. Payara also has a strong community support system, with regular bug fixes and new features being contributed by the community.

  2. Stability and Reliability: Payara is known for offering a more stable and reliable runtime environment compared to GlassFish. Payara ensures backward compatibility for applications developed on GlassFish, while also providing crucial bug fixes and enhancements to improve its overall stability. The Payara team prioritizes fixing critical issues and provides long-term support for their releases, making it a favorable choice for enterprise-level deployments.

  3. Administration and Management: Payara provides additional administration and management features compared to GlassFish. It includes a centralized admin console with an improved user interface, enhanced monitoring and clustering capabilities, and powerful scripting tools for automation. These features make it easier to manage and deploy applications in complex production environments, which can save time and effort for administrators.

  4. Compatibility: Payara maintains compatibility with the GlassFish APIs, allowing developers to seamlessly migrate their applications from GlassFish to Payara without any major changes or modifications. This ensures that existing applications can be easily transitioned to Payara, taking advantage of its added features and improvements.

  5. Enterprise Support: Payara offers professional support and services for organizations that require additional assistance and expertise. These support packages provide access to technical support, training, and consulting services, ensuring that organizations can get help when they need it. GlassFish, on the other hand, offers support through Oracle's enterprise support program, which may have different pricing and service levels.

  6. Updates and Patches: Payara is known for providing more frequent updates and patches compared to GlassFish. Payara releases regular updates and extensions to ensure that the server is up-to-date with the latest developments in the Java ecosystem. This can be advantageous for organizations that require the latest security fixes, performance improvements, and new features.

**In Summary, GlassFish and Payara have key differences in terms of development and community support, stability and reliability, administration and management features, compatibility with GlassFish APIs, availability of enterprise support, and frequency of updates and patches. These differences make Payara a more favorable choice for organizations seeking a stable, reliable, and well-supported Java application server.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GlassFish
GlassFish
Payara
Payara

An Application Server means, It can manage Java EE applications You should use GlassFish for Java EE enterprise applications. The need for a seperate Web server is mostly needed in a production environment.

It Server is a drop in replacement for GlassFish Server Open Source Edition with quarterly releases containing enhancements, bug fixes and patches.

-
Full Web Based Administration Console; Fully Scriptable Command Line Interface; Full REST-based Management Console; Fully Instrumented via JMX; Supports Rolling Upgrades of Java EE Applications
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
903
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
312
Stacks
581
Stacks
41
Followers
112
Followers
73
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
CentOS
CentOS
Oracle
Oracle
Windows
Windows
Ubuntu
Ubuntu

What are some alternatives to GlassFish, Payara?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase