StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. GlassFish vs JBoss

GlassFish vs JBoss

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JBoss
JBoss
Stacks457
Followers255
Votes0
GlassFish
GlassFish
Stacks581
Followers112
Votes0

GlassFish vs JBoss: What are the differences?

Introduction

GlassFish and JBoss are both popular Java application servers that are used for deploying and managing Java applications. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Architecture: GlassFish is based on a modular architecture known as OSGi, which allows for greater flexibility in terms of adding and removing services. JBoss, on the other hand, is based on a microservices architecture, which allows for better scalability and fault tolerance.

  2. Community support: GlassFish is supported by Oracle, which provides regular updates and patches. It also has a large community of developers who contribute to its development. JBoss, on the other hand, is supported by Red Hat, which also provides regular updates and has a strong community of developers.

  3. Ease of use: GlassFish is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It has a user-friendly interface and is easy to set up and configure. JBoss, on the other hand, can be more complex to set up and configure, especially for beginners.

  4. Integration with other tools: GlassFish has good integration with other tools in the Java ecosystem, such as NetBeans and Eclipse. It also has support for other programming languages, such as PHP and Ruby. JBoss, on the other hand, has strong integration with the Red Hat ecosystem, including tools like Ansible and OpenShift.

  5. Supported standards: GlassFish is known for its strong support for Java EE standards, including the latest specifications. It is considered a reference implementation for Java EE. JBoss also provides support for Java EE, but it may not have the same level of support for the latest specifications as GlassFish.

  6. Performance: GlassFish is known for its good performance, especially for small to medium-sized applications. JBoss, on the other hand, is known for its scalability and performance, making it a better choice for large-scale enterprise applications.

In summary, GlassFish and JBoss have key differences in terms of architecture, community support, ease of use, integration with other tools, supported standards, and performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JBoss
JBoss
GlassFish
GlassFish

An application platform for hosting your apps that provides an innovative modular, cloud-ready architecture, powerful management and automation, and world class developer productivity.

An Application Server means, It can manage Java EE applications You should use GlassFish for Java EE enterprise applications. The need for a seperate Web server is mostly needed in a production environment.

Statistics
Stacks
457
Stacks
581
Followers
255
Followers
112
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to JBoss, GlassFish?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase