StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitLab vs Go.CD

GitLab vs Go.CD

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
GoCD
GoCD
Stacks205
Followers325
Votes207
GitHub Stars7.3K
Forks980

GitLab vs Go.CD: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between GitLab and Go.CD. GitLab and Go.CD are both popular DevOps tools that help streamline the software development and deployment process. While they share some similarities, there are also significant differences between the two platforms. Let's delve into the key distinctions.

  1. Deployment Pipeline Configuration: GitLab primarily focuses on providing a complete DevOps platform that includes version control, issue tracking, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. While GitLab does have a built-in CI/CD pipeline feature, it lacks the extensive customization options offered by Go.CD. Go.CD is specifically designed to simplify complex deployment pipelines by providing an intuitive and configurable interface. It allows users to define dependencies, orchestrations, fan-ins, and fan-outs, making it a powerful tool for managing intricate pipelines.

  2. Configuration Management: GitLab and Go.CD differ in their approach to configuration management. GitLab employs a declarative configuration approach, where users specify the desired state in a configuration file, and GitLab handles the execution. On the other hand, Go.CD adopts an imperative configuration approach, where users define the exact steps required to achieve the desired state. This allows for more granular control and allows teams to build more complex and flexible pipelines.

  3. Plugins and Extensions: Go.CD offers a vast library of plugins and extensions that enhance its functionality and make it easier to integrate with other tools in the DevOps ecosystem. These plugins provide support for various version control systems, notification mechanisms, analytics tools, and more. GitLab, on the other hand, offers a more integrated approach, where many functionalities are natively built into the platform. While GitLab does provide some plugins and integrations, it may require additional customization to achieve the same level of extensibility as Go.CD.

  4. User Interface: The user interface of GitLab and Go.CD differs significantly. GitLab provides a comprehensive web-based interface that encompasses all aspects of the DevOps lifecycle, including code management, issue tracking, and CI/CD pipelines. On the other hand, Go.CD focuses primarily on the pipeline orchestration and provides a simple, intuitive interface for pipeline configuration and visualization. This streamlined interface makes it easier for users to understand and manage their pipelines.

  5. Community and Support: GitLab has a large and active community, which contributes to its continuous improvement and provides a wealth of resources for users. The community-driven model allows for rapid development and innovation. Go.CD, while also having a dedicated community, is more commercially driven, with support and additional features available through commercial subscriptions. The choice between the two platforms depends on the level of community support desired and the need for commercial support and features.

  6. Pricing Model: GitLab offers a range of pricing options, including a free tier for small teams and a paid tier for enterprise customers. It follows a subscription-based pricing model that includes technical support and access to additional features. Go.CD, on the other hand, offers a free and open-source version that is suitable for many organizations. However, commercial support and additional enterprise features are available through a commercial subscription.

In summary, GitLab provides a complete DevOps platform with built-in CI/CD pipeline features, while Go.CD specializes in pipeline orchestration and configurability. GitLab adopts a declarative configuration approach, while Go.CD follows an imperative approach. Go.CD offers a broader range of plugins and extensions, while GitLab focuses on integration within its own platform. The user interface and community support differ between the two platforms, and the pricing models also vary. Overall, the choice between GitLab and Go.CD depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, GoCD

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
GoCD
GoCD

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Model complex workflows with dependency management and parallel execution; Easy to pass once-built binaries between stages; Visibility into your end-to-end workflow. Track a change from commit to deploy at a glance; Manual triggers allow deployment any version at anytime. And it's securable and auditable; Run tests written in most languages or frameworks, provides informative testing report; Compare both files and commit messages across any two arbitrary builds; Eliminate Bottlenecks by providing trivial parallel execution across pipelines, platforms, versions, branches, etc.; Easily reuse pipeline configurations via template system.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
7.3K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
980
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
205
Followers
54.5K
Followers
325
Votes
2.5K
Votes
207
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 32
    Open source
  • 27
    Pipeline dependencies
  • 25
    Pipeline structures
  • 22
    Can run jobs in parallel
  • 20
    Very flexible
Cons
  • 2
    Lack of plugins
  • 2
    Horrible ui
  • 1
    No support
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to GitLab, GoCD?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana