StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Code Search
  5. GitHub Enterprise vs Sourcegraph

GitHub Enterprise vs Sourcegraph

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sourcegraph
Sourcegraph
Stacks101
Followers124
Votes8
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Stacks500
Followers627
Votes10

GitHub Enterprise vs Sourcegraph: What are the differences?

# Introduction

GitHub Enterprise and Sourcegraph are two popular platforms used in the software development industry. Each platform offers unique features and benefits that cater to specific needs of organizations.

1. **Deployment**: GitHub Enterprise is a self-hosted solution that allows organizations to run it on their own servers, providing full control over data management and security. In contrast, Sourcegraph is a cloud-based platform, eliminating the need for organizations to manage their own infrastructure and allowing for easy scalability.
   
2. **Code Collaboration**: GitHub Enterprise is primarily focused on code collaboration, offering features such as pull requests, code reviews, and issue tracking to facilitate team collaboration. Sourcegraph, on the other hand, focuses more on code exploration and analysis, providing advanced code search and analysis capabilities.
   
3. **Integration**: GitHub Enterprise integrates seamlessly with a wide range of existing tools and services commonly used in the software development workflow, such as CI/CD pipelines and project management tools. Sourcegraph also offers integration options; however, its primary focus is on enhancing the code browsing and discovery experience.
   
4. **Code Intelligence**: Sourcegraph specializes in code intelligence, providing advanced code navigation, intelligent code search, and code analysis features that help developers better understand and navigate complex codebases. While GitHub Enterprise also offers some code intelligence features, its primary focus remains on code collaboration and project management.
   
5. **Scalability**: GitHub Enterprise is well-suited for organizations of all sizes, offering the flexibility to scale up or down based on the needs of the organization. Sourcegraph, being a cloud-based platform, offers seamless scalability and performance optimization to support growing teams and codebases.
   
6. **License Model**: GitHub Enterprise follows a traditional per-user licensing model, where organizations have to pay per user. On the other hand, Sourcegraph follows a usage-based pricing model, allowing organizations to pay based on the resources consumed, providing more cost-effective options for smaller teams or projects.

# Summary

In Summary, GitHub Enterprise and Sourcegraph differ in deployment options, focus areas, integration capabilities, code intelligence features, scalability, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sourcegraph
Sourcegraph
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise

Sourcegraph is a universal code search tool that lets you find and fix things across ALL your code -- any code host, any repo, any language. Stay in flow and find your answers quickly with smart filters, and more.

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

Search your private code or open source code across thousands of repos in GitHub, GitLab, and more; Quickly navigate code with contextual hover tool tips; Construct complex queries and filter code in ways that IDEs and code hosts can’t; A visual and interactive query builder supports regular expressions and syntax-aware pattern matching so you get your answers in seconds; Find definitions, references, usage examples, and anything else in code, across package, dependency, and repository boundaries; Automate large-scale code changes across multiple repositories; Generate insights about your codebase to understand aggregate trends
Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Statistics
Stacks
101
Stacks
500
Followers
124
Followers
627
Votes
8
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Understand the connections between code components
  • 4
    Discover why code works the way it does
Pros
  • 4
    Expensive - $$$
  • 2
    CDCI with Github Actions
  • 2
    Code security
  • 1
    Draft Pull Request
  • 1
    Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available
Cons
  • 2
    $$$
Integrations
Mercurial
Mercurial
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Codecov
Codecov
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
GitLab
GitLab
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
Atom
Atom
GoLand
GoLand
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Sourcegraph, GitHub Enterprise?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana