StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. GitLab CI vs Github Actions

GitLab CI vs Github Actions

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab CI
GitLab CI
Stacks2.3K
Followers1.6K
Votes75
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
Stacks48.2K
Followers3.1K
Votes27

GitLab CI vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

Introduction: GitLab CI and GitHub Actions are both continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) platforms that help automate software development workflows. While they serve a similar purpose, they have several key differences that make each platform unique.

  1. Workflow Configuration: GitLab CI uses a YAML file called .gitlab-ci.yml to define the stages, jobs, and steps of a CI/CD pipeline. It follows a declarative approach, allowing users to specify the desired state of the pipeline. On the other hand, GitHub Actions uses YAML files called workflow files that are stored in the .github/workflows directory. It follows an imperative approach, allowing users to define the exact steps to be executed.

  2. Built-in Integration: GitLab CI is tightly integrated with the GitLab platform, providing seamless integration with other GitLab features like issue tracking, code reviews, and container registry. GitHub Actions, on the other hand, is closely integrated with GitHub, offering native integration with pull requests, issues, and the GitHub ecosystem.

  3. Parallel Execution: GitLab CI allows parallel execution of jobs by default, enabling faster CI/CD pipelines. It automatically distributes jobs across available runners, optimizing resource utilization. In contrast, GitHub Actions had a limited parallelism feature initially, but now also allows parallel execution, albeit with some limitations on the number of concurrent jobs depending on the user plan.

  4. Pricing Model: GitLab CI is part of the GitLab platform, which comes with a different pricing structure based on GitLab's plans. It offers various tiers ranging from free to enterprise editions, with different features and capabilities. GitHub Actions, on the other hand, is included in all GitHub plans, including the free tier, allowing users to benefit from its CI/CD capabilities at no additional cost.

  5. Third-Party Actions: GitHub Actions has a rich ecosystem of third-party actions available in the GitHub Marketplace. These pre-built actions provide additional functionality and integrations that can be easily added to workflows. GitLab CI also has a collection of community-contributed CI/CD templates, but the availability of pre-built actions is not as extensive as in GitHub Actions.

  6. Deployment Environments: GitLab CI allows the definition of multiple deployment environments, each representing a stage in the software delivery pipeline. It facilitates the separation of tasks and enables easy promotion of code through different environments. GitHub Actions, on the other hand, does not have a built-in feature similar to GitLab's deployment environments, making it less suitable for complex multi-stage deployment scenarios.

In summary, GitLab CI and GitHub Actions differ in their workflow configuration, integration with the respective platforms, parallel execution capabilities, pricing models, availability of third-party actions, and support for deployment environments. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the project and the development team's preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab CI, GitHub Actions

Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments
Stratos
Stratos

Jan 13, 2020

Needs advice

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

  • Fast SBT builds (caching)
  • Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
  • Everything as code
  • Ease of use
181k views181k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Feb 14, 2020

Decided

Buddy is one of the most easy-to-use tools for CI I ever met. When I needed to set up the pipeline I was really impressed with how easy it is to create it with Buddy with only a few moments. It's literally like:

  1. Add repo
  2. Click - Click - Click
  3. You're done and your app is on prod :D The top feature that I've found is a simple integration with different notification channels - not only Slack (which is the one by default), but Telegram and Discord. The support is also neat - guys respond pretty quickly on even a small issue.
157k views157k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab CI
GitLab CI
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions

GitLab offers a continuous integration service. If you add a .gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline.

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

-
Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.3K
Stacks
48.2K
Followers
1.6K
Followers
3.1K
Votes
75
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 22
    Robust CI with awesome Docker support
  • 13
    Simple configuration
  • 9
    All in one solution
  • 7
    Source Control and CI in one place
  • 5
    Integrated with VCS on commit
Cons
  • 2
    Works best with GitLab repositories
Pros
  • 8
    Integration with GitHub
  • 5
    Free
  • 3
    Ready actions in Marketplace
  • 3
    Easy to duplicate a workflow
  • 2
    Configs stored in .github
Cons
  • 5
    Lacking [skip ci]
  • 4
    Lacking allow failure
  • 3
    Lacking job specific badges
  • 2
    No ssh login to servers
  • 1
    No Deployment Projects
Integrations
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to GitLab CI, GitHub Actions?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Airflow

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana