StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Version Control System
  5. Git vs TeamCity

Git vs TeamCity

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Git
Git
Stacks343.7K
Followers184.2K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars57.1K
Forks26.9K
TeamCity
TeamCity
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.1K
Votes316

Git vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown document presents the key differences between Git and TeamCity.

  1. Branching and merging: Git allows for easy branching and merging of code. Developers can create and switch between branches to work on different features or bug fixes independently, then merge those changes back into the main branch. TeamCity, on the other hand, is a continuous integration and deployment tool that focuses on building and testing code. While it can detect and resolve merge conflicts, it does not have the same level of branching and merging capabilities as Git.

  2. Version control vs build tool: Git is primarily a distributed version control system that tracks changes to files and directories in a project. It enables developers to collaborate, manage code history, and revert to previous versions if needed. TeamCity, on the other hand, is a build tool that automates the process of building, testing, and deploying software. It integrates with version control systems like Git to fetch the latest code and trigger automated builds based on defined configurations.

  3. Collaboration and code review: Git provides features like pull requests, code review tools, and comment threads to facilitate code collaboration and review. Developers can review code changes, leave comments, suggest improvements, and conduct discussions before merging changes into the main branch. TeamCity, on the other hand, focuses on automating the build process and may not have the same level of collaboration tools specifically for code review.

  4. Continuous integration vs version control: Git helps developers manage code changes and collaborate effectively, but it does not have built-in continuous integration capabilities. TeamCity, on the other hand, specializes in continuous integration and can automatically build, test, and deploy code changes. It enables developers to automatically trigger builds, run tests, and receive feedback on the quality of their code.

  5. Build pipeline and deployment: TeamCity provides a visual build pipeline that allows developers to define different stages and tasks involved in the build and deployment process. It allows for the configuration of build steps, integration with external tools, environment setup, and monitoring of the build pipeline. Git, on the other hand, does not have built-in features for defining and managing complex build pipelines and deployment processes.

  6. Extensibility and integrations: Git has a rich ecosystem of integrations and can be easily extended with various tools and plugins to enhance its functionality. It can integrate with project management tools, issue trackers, code review systems, and more. TeamCity, being a build tool, also has a range of integrations but focuses mainly on integrating with version control systems, build runners, test frameworks, and deployment tools to automate the build and test process.

In summary, Git is a distributed version control system that facilitates code collaboration and tracking of changes, while TeamCity is a build tool that automates the build, test, and deployment process. Git provides more advanced branching and merging capabilities, code review features, and customization options, while TeamCity specializes in continuous integration and provides a visual build pipeline for automating the build process.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Git
Git
TeamCity
TeamCity

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

-
Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
57.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
26.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
343.7K
Stacks
1.2K
Followers
184.2K
Followers
1.1K
Votes
6.6K
Votes
316
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1429
    Distributed version control system
  • 1053
    Efficient branching and merging
  • 959
    Fast
  • 843
    Open source
  • 726
    Better than svn
Cons
  • 16
    Hard to learn
  • 11
    Inconsistent command line interface
  • 9
    Easy to lose uncommitted work
  • 8
    Worst documentation ever possibly made
  • 5
    Awful merge handling
Pros
  • 61
    Easy to configure
  • 37
    Reliable and high-quality
  • 32
    On premise
  • 32
    Github integration
  • 32
    User friendly
Cons
  • 3
    High costs for more than three build agents
  • 2
    Proprietary
  • 2
    User-friendly
  • 2
    User friendly
Integrations
No integrations available
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to Git, TeamCity?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Mercurial

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana